Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[BugFix]support table function on compute nodes #34577
[BugFix]support table function on compute nodes #34577
Changes from 2 commits
fa5e30a
efa89c8
02435f8
d042868
3dae998
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code reviews can vary in depth and focus depending on the context of the code change and what the reviewers are looking for. Here’s a summary of potential suggestions for this particular diff snippet review:
Consistent Naming:
Backend
toComputeNode
might be implying thatBackend
has been either replaced or extended byComputeNode
. It's crucial to verify everywhere in the codebase that this change is consistently applied and documented if it is part of a larger refactoring.Exception Message Clarity:
Feature Toggles or Runtime Configuration:
RunMode.getCurrentRunMode()
seems like it might be introducing runtime configuration control flow, which can be both powerful and risky. Ensure there is enough test coverage for both branches (shared-nothing and otherwise) and that these runtime changes are well-documented.Error Handling and Retry Logic:
Thread Safety and Concurrency:
Collections.shuffle(nodeIds);
implies a mutation of thenodeIds
list. If nodeIds is shared across threads, this operation could introduce race conditions. Ensure that eithernodeIds
is confined to a single thread or is otherwise safely published between threads.Code Duplication:
nodeIds
is empty and when looking for backends or compute nodes. If similar logic is used in multiple places, consider abstracting it into a method to promote reuse and simplify future updates.Unit Testing:
RunMode.getCurrentRunMode()
), unit tests need to be updated or added to cover the new scenarios to ensure that the behavior is as expected.Performance Implications:
Documentation and Comments:
Dependency on Global State:
GlobalStateMgr
). Be aware that such reliance makes unit testing more difficult and may increase coupling, which can lead to issues with maintainability.Without the broader context or understanding of prior and future pieces of work, these are top-level suggestions. Changes connected with databases, distributed systems, or resilient service design typically involve deeper considerations, which would be reviewed as part of a more thorough code base analysis.