Skip to content

Create rule S7610: Sensitive information should not be logged in production builds #5133

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 27, 2025

Conversation

github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

You can preview this rule here (updated a few minutes after each push).

Review

A dedicated reviewer checked the rule description successfully for:

  • logical errors and incorrect information
  • information gaps and missing content
  • text style and tone
  • PR summary and labels follow the guidelines

@egon-okerman-sonarsource egon-okerman-sonarsource changed the title Create rule S7610 Create rule S7610: Sensitive information should not be logged in production builds Jun 17, 2025
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-tools'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-frontend'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add ASVS mapping.
Also, I am not sure it's generally true that other applications can read logcat on Android.

@egon-okerman-sonarsource
Copy link
Contributor

@pierre-loup-tristant-sonarsource I see I forgot to push my changes here 🙈 . Could you take a look at the changes so this PR can be merged?

Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-tools'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed for 'rspec-frontend'

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0 Dependency risks
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@egon-okerman-sonarsource egon-okerman-sonarsource marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2025 09:21
@egon-okerman-sonarsource egon-okerman-sonarsource added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 27, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit fae62e1 Jun 27, 2025
12 of 13 checks passed
@egon-okerman-sonarsource egon-okerman-sonarsource deleted the rule/add-RSPEC-S7610 branch June 27, 2025 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants