Resolves #5808: Fix missing K1C processes #5815
Conversation
BruffyT
changed the title
|
Hello! Could you provide more if a description of what is being fixed? It is not very clear with only the after screenshots. Also, when creating a PR that resolves an issue, please use a supported keyword followed by the issue number. This links the issue the the PR and automatically closes the issue when the PR is merged. Here are some details on that: https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/using-keywords-in-issues-and-pull-requests |
BruffyT
changed the title
BruffyT
changed the title
|
Hi, I have updated the details for you. Hope this is okay. |
|
Oh, I'm sorry. The keyword for linking the issue should be done in the body of the PR, not the title 😁 |
|
I wonder if we should rename the machine profile to include the "()" so it's consistent with K1 profiles instead? Though I guess that could cause compatibility issue for existing user. |
|
That was my thought @Noisyfox i wanted to cause the least chance of disruption to users |
SoftFever
changed the title
Resolves #5808
Screenshots of evidance that they are now showing attatched below
Before not showing layer height profiles:
After now showing the profiles:
0.6mm Nozzle:
0.8mm Nozzle:
Update after [ee52ec3]:
0.6mm Nozzle:
0.8mm Nozzle: