Reload All and Project Path

[chshkhr]

Description

1. Reload All Objects
2. Info about Source Path of the object selected

Screenshots

[SoftFever]

Can you explain a bit the changes here?

[chshkhr]

If the file not found in the current directory and exists on the initial file path it will be reloaded from there. Otherwise user will be prompted to select file manually.

So the file in the current directory has priority on the sorce file. This allows to copy project file to other directory, press Reload All and have same project with new STL files loaded.

But if you didn't move the project file to other place where new STL files exist Reload All will work the same way as before these changes were made.

[SoftFever]

If the file not found in the current directory and exists on the initial file path it will be reloaded from there. Otherwise user will be prompted to select file manually.

This logic change sounds not very right to me.
The initial file path should have the priority IMO. It's also the logic in PS, can we revert the change?

[chshkhr]

Sure. It's better to have Reload All with another logic in the main branch than not to have at all)
I will continue using this logic.

[SoftFever]

Sure. It's better to have Reload All with another logic in the main branch than not to have at all)
I will continue using this logic.

I'm not sure if I understand it.
Can you clarify?

[chshkhr]

I'm not sure if I understand it. Can you clarify?

This logic works the same way as original one untill you copy amf project to another directory where new stl files with the same names exist. It's very convenient for me as a 3D designer when I have several versions of a model. Different sizes for instance. You simply copy project to another folder, Reload All and you have new version ready to print.

[SoftFever]

I'm not sure if I understand it. Can you clarify?

This logic works the same way as original one untill you copy amf project to another directory where new stl files with the same names exist. It's very convenient for me as a 3D designer when I have several versions of a model. Different sizes for instance. You simply copy project to another folder, Reload All and you have new version ready to print.

I see. I understand this is convenient for this special case.
On the other hand, it's counterintuitive and will certainly confuse many users. So, I'm inclined not to include this change.

[chshkhr]

I'm not sure if I understand it. Can you clarify?

This logic works the same way as original one untill you copy amf project to another directory where new stl files with the same names exist. It's very convenient for me as a 3D designer when I have several versions of a model. Different sizes for instance. You simply copy project to another folder, Reload All and you have new version ready to print.

I see. I understand this is convenient for this special case. On the other hand, it's counterintuitive and will certainly confuse many users. So, I'm inclined not to include this change.

The users wil not certainly even notice the difference but you are owner and you decide.

[SoftFever]

I'm not sure if I understand it. Can you clarify?

This logic works the same way as original one untill you copy amf project to another directory where new stl files with the same names exist. It's very convenient for me as a 3D designer when I have several versions of a model. Different sizes for instance. You simply copy project to another folder, Reload All and you have new version ready to print.

I see. I understand this is convenient for this special case. On the other hand, it's counterintuitive and will certainly confuse many users. So, I'm inclined not to include this change.

The users wil not certainly even notice the difference but you are owner and you decide.

I agree that in most cases, it won't cause any difference.
However, when issues do arise, users will be completely lost about what's happening. ;)
If we could revert the changes in this specific part, that would be great.

[chshkhr]

The users wil not certainly even notice the difference but you are owner and you decide.

I agree that in most cases, it won't cause any difference. However, when issues do arise, users will be completely lost about what's happening. ;) If we could revert the changes in this specific part, that would be great.

I agree. Do you want me to change the pool request or can you do it yourself?

[SoftFever]

The users wil not certainly even notice the difference but you are owner and you decide.

I agree that in most cases, it won't cause any difference. However, when issues do arise, users will be completely lost about what's happening. ;) If we could revert the changes in this specific part, that would be great.

I agree. Do you want me to change the pool request or can you do it yourself?

Please go ahead and change the PR. Appreciate it.

[chshkhr]

The users wil not certainly even notice the difference but you are owner and you decide.

I agree that in most cases, it won't cause any difference. However, when issues do arise, users will be completely lost about what's happening. ;) If we could revert the changes in this specific part, that would be great.

I agree. Do you want me to change the pool request or can you do it yourself?

Please go ahead and change the PR. Appreciate it.

Done

[SoftFever]

Looks good.
Thank you!