Description
I have checked that this feature is not already implemented
- This feature does not exist
Use case
Our ruby codebase uses sorbet types in some of it'sfiles (lots of typed: false
still hanging around). So devs like to have both ruby-lsp and the sorbet lsp running, one for the typed files and one for untyped files.
This works well for the untyped files as sorbet tends not display signature helpers/definitions etc. But once we are in the realm of typed: true
, both ruby-lsp and sorbet will try do similar things. So sometimes both of the LSP's will provide similar information/details.
Description
I think that it would be great if the ruby lsp were to integrate a little tighter with the sorbet LSP. We could give users control of which typed files are worth displaying hints on. I'm thinking a setting that allows users to toggle whether we want ruby-lsp to be suggesting on typed: {true|strict}
files.
Implementation
No response