Skip to content

Reproducibility issue... ResNet 32 vs 34.. Fraud? #16

Open
@piltgha

Description

@piltgha

Thank you for your efforts, but I still doubt about the performance you reported since the Colab code uses ResNet-34 but your paper achieved the performance with ResNet32.

ResNet 34 has far different from ResNet 32 in the perspective of internal channel. ResNet 32 uses 3 stage with internal channel 16, 32, 64. and final fully connected layer uses only 64-dim feature.

ResNet 34 uses 512-dim feature with very large internal channels begins from 64.

Not just piling up 2 layers, they have such a big difference. But you only suggested ResNet34, which has huge parameters. But you reported you used ResNet 32 for CIFAR 100-LT to achieve the performance.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions