Skip to content

Conversation

Vattikondadheeraj
Copy link

@Vattikondadheeraj Vattikondadheeraj commented Aug 22, 2025

Description by Korbit AI

What change is being made?

Introduce the PrivalegedAgent and its components for enhanced privileged information handling, integrate new privileged action pathways, and add row indexing to various analysis modules.

Why are these changes being made?

These changes are made to enable the GenericAgent to utilize privileged action pathways, offering more advanced debugging and tracking capabilities, which improves the contextually aware decision-making process in complex tasks. Additionally, the row indexing enhancements in analysis modules like agent_xray.py and json_xray.py provide better traceability and data inspection during experiments.

Is this description stale? Ask me to generate a new description by commenting /korbit-generate-pr-description

Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review by Korbit AI

Korbit automatically attempts to detect when you fix issues in new commits.
Category Issue Status
Error Handling Silent Failure in Privileged Action Processing ▹ view
Readability Unused function without clear purpose ▹ view
Performance Inefficient Row-wise DataFrame Operation ▹ view
Error Handling Redundant State Change Before Exception ▹ view
Files scanned
File Path Reviewed
src/agentlab/agents/generic_agent/generic_agent.py
src/agentlab/agents/privaleged_info_agent/privaleged_agent_prompt.py
src/agentlab/agents/privaleged_info_agent/privaleged_agent.py
src/agentlab/analyze/json_xray.py
src/agentlab/experiments/loop.py
src/agentlab/analyze/agent_xray.py

Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.

Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.

Loving Korbit!? Share us on LinkedIn Reddit and X

Comment on lines +127 to +140
def extract_section(text: str, start_marker: str, end_marker: str) -> str | None:
if not isinstance(text, str):
return None
try:
start = text.find(start_marker)
if start == -1:
return None
start += len(start_marker)
end = text.find(end_marker, start)
if end == -1:
return text[start:].strip()
return text[start:end].strip()
except Exception:
return None
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unused function without clear purpose category Readability

Tell me more
What is the issue?

The extract_section function appears unused in the code and its purpose is unclear without context.

Why this matters

Dead code increases cognitive load as readers try to understand its purpose and relationship to other code. If unused, it should be removed.

Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview

Either remove the unused function or if it's needed for future use, add a comment explaining its purpose and mark it as reserved for future use:

# Reserved for future use: Extracts text between start_marker and end_marker from conversation logs
Provide feedback to improve future suggestions

Nice Catch Incorrect Not in Scope Not in coding standard Other

💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.

"""
)
except Exception as e:
# raise RuntimeError(f"No privilaged action will for goal {self.goal}.") from e
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Silent Failure in Privileged Action Processing category Error Handling

Tell me more
What is the issue?

The code suppresses a potential exception when handling privileged actions by commenting out the error raising line.

Why this matters

If an error occurs while processing the trajectory for privileged actions, the code silently fails. This can lead to unexpected behavior where the agent continues without the required trajectory information.

Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview

The error should be properly handled to ensure the agent behaves correctly when trajectory information is missing:

try:
    # trajectory processing code
except Exception as e:
    raise RuntimeError(f"Failed to process privileged action trajectory for goal {self.goal}.") from e
Provide feedback to improve future suggestions

Nice Catch Incorrect Not in Scope Not in coding standard Other

💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.

@@ -1003,14 +1021,17 @@ def get_seeds_df(result_df: pd.DataFrame, task_name: str):
def extract_columns(row: pd.Series):
return pd.Series(
{
"seed": row[TASK_SEED_KEY],
"index": row.get("_row_index", None),
"seed": row.get(TASK_SEED_KEY, None),
"reward": row.get("cum_reward", None),
"err": bool(row.get("err_msg", None)),
"n_steps": row.get("n_steps", None),
}
)

seed_df = result_df.apply(extract_columns, axis=1)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Inefficient Row-wise DataFrame Operation category Performance

Tell me more
What is the issue?

Using pandas apply() with axis=1 which is computationally expensive as it iterates row by row.

Why this matters

Row-wise operations in pandas are much slower than vectorized operations, impacting performance especially with large dataframes.

Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview

Use vectorized operations instead:

seed_df = pd.DataFrame({
    'index': result_df.get('_row_index', None),
    'seed': result_df.get(TASK_SEED_KEY, None),
    'reward': result_df.get('cum_reward', None),
    'err': result_df.get('err_msg', None).astype(bool),
    'n_steps': result_df.get('n_steps', None)
})
Provide feedback to improve future suggestions

Nice Catch Incorrect Not in Scope Not in coding standard Other

💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.

Comment on lines +107 to +110
sub_df = tmp_df[tmp_df["_row_index"] == episode_id.row_index]
if len(sub_df) == 0:
self.exp_result = None
raise ValueError(f"Could not find episode for row_index: {episode_id.row_index}")
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Redundant State Change Before Exception category Error Handling

Tell me more
What is the issue?

The code sets exp_result to None before raising the ValueError, which is unnecessary since the exception will interrupt execution.

Why this matters

Setting state before raising an exception is redundant and could be misleading to maintainers about the object's state after an exception.

Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview

Remove redundant state change:

if len(sub_df) == 0:
    raise ValueError(f"Could not find episode for row_index: {episode_id.row_index}")
Provide feedback to improve future suggestions

Nice Catch Incorrect Not in Scope Not in coding standard Other

💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants