-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
fix: revert clearing response on initialize #37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for vatruzhka ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
Summary of ChangesHello @Sepulator, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request implements a bug fix within the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request updates the setUrl action in the rest-client store to also clear the previous API response. This is a good user experience improvement, as it prevents displaying stale data when the user modifies the request URL. My review includes one comment pointing out a discrepancy between the code change and the pull request's title and description, which could cause confusion. I've recommended updating them to improve the clarity of the project's history.
| setUrl: (url) => { | ||
| set({ url }); | ||
| set({ url, response: null }); | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While clearing the response when the URL is updated is a good enhancement to prevent showing stale data, the pull request title ("fix: revert clearing response on initialize") and description ("revert reset response") are inconsistent with the code change. The code adds the functionality to clear the response, while the title and description suggest the opposite. This discrepancy can be misleading for future developers reviewing the commit history. Please consider updating the title and description to accurately reflect the change, for example: feat: Clear response when URL is updated.
…-client-app into fix/clear-response-on-url
Type of PR 🍩
Changes Introduced 🥯
Self-Check ✅