Skip to content

[🚀 Feature]: We should stick to main chrome channel instead of CFT (Chrome for Testing) #2041

@amardeep2006

Description

@amardeep2006

Feature and motivation

I am sharing my thoughts that why we should stick to existing method of Chrome installation untill there is apt-get way to install CFT.

  1. The business users use chrome so to keep it closest possible to real case scenarios. CFT may share the same source code but installation method differs so sharing my doubts.
  2. CFT is supplied without OS dependency graph just a zip. No matter how hard we try, we cannot replicate apt-get . Apt not only takes care of chrome installations but also takes care of os package compatibility.

We are already getting chrome driver from CFT endpoints which is tried tested and stable method.

We should stick with existing method for stability in my opinion untill Google provides an easy way ( e.g. ppa repo) for CFT and we are able to install via apt-get OR we have some solid reason to do so.
Please share your thoughts .

Usage example

Stability of chrome.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions