Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: improve handling of custom types #103

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 2, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Seddryck
Copy link
Owner

@Seddryck Seddryck commented Feb 1, 2025

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 68.33333% with 19 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 79.95%. Comparing base (0a4af2b) to head (c55c733).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
PocketCsvReader/CsvDataRecord.cs 56.66% 7 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
PocketCsvReader/FieldParsing/TypeParserLocator.cs 73.91% 2 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #103      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   80.34%   79.95%   -0.40%     
==========================================
  Files          65       66       +1     
  Lines        1623     1661      +38     
  Branches      307      319      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits         1304     1328      +24     
- Misses        211      218       +7     
- Partials      108      115       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Seddryck Seddryck merged commit f88a48a into main Feb 2, 2025
5 checks passed
@Seddryck Seddryck deleted the feat/improve-custom-type branch February 2, 2025 11:42
@Seddryck Seddryck added the new-feature Request for a new feature in the tool label Feb 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
new-feature Request for a new feature in the tool
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants