Skip to content

add gemini file content #1064

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 27, 2025
Merged

Conversation

iceljc
Copy link
Collaborator

@iceljc iceljc commented May 26, 2025

No description provided.

@GGHansome
Copy link

Auto Review Result:

Code Review Summary

Purpose and Impact of Changes: The code modifications primarily focus on enhancing flexibility with respect to different AI providers, such as OpenAI and Google-AI, by abstracting certain functionalities and integrating new ones. These updates improve the overall modularity and adaptability of the system's file handling and chat completion processes.

Identified Issues

Issue 1: Obsolete or Extraneous Code

  • Description: Several using statements, such as using BotSharp.Abstraction.Infrastructures; and other similar lines, are removed. This might be intentional to clean up unused code but ensure it doesn't affect dependencies.
  • Suggestion: Verify that the removed using statements are genuinely redundant and not required elsewhere.
    // Before
    using BotSharp.Abstraction.Infrastructures;
    // After
    // No change needed if confirmed redundant

Issue 2: Conditional Logic Simplification

  • Description: The logic for determining target files in the ReadPdf method seems to have room for simplification, especially when checking against the provider.
  • Suggestion: Consider refactoring nested conditions to make code more readable and maintainable.
    // Before
    if (provider != "google-ai") { targetFiles = await ConvertPdfToImages(pdfFiles); }
    // After
    switch(provider) {
        case "google-ai": break;
        default: targetFiles = await ConvertPdfToImages(pdfFiles); break;
    }

Issue 3: Nullability and Defaulting Issues

  • Description: There are numerous checks for nullability that might be compounded or handled more consistently, such as options?.Provider ?? "openai".
  • Suggestion: Define default values upfront wherever possible.
    var provider = options?.Provider ?? "openai";
    // Define defaults in one place
    const string defaultProvider = "openai";
    var provider = options?.Provider ?? defaultProvider;

Overall Evaluation

The code changes are mostly positive, emphasizing modularity and clearer logical separation between components based on providers like OpenAI and Google-AI. However, ensuring the removal of unused statements does not impact dependencies and refining conditional and default logic will further enhance maintainability and performance.

@GGHansome
Copy link

Auto Review Result:

Code Review Summary

Change Overview: The changes involve enhancements and refinements in several areas of the BotSharp codebase, such as provider handling, file processing, chat completion functionalities, and integration with different APIs. The modifications improve flexibility, error handling, and add support for multi-modal content interactions.

Identified Issues

Issue 1: Redundant Namespace Imports

  • Description: In some cases, namespaces that are no longer used after refactoring are still included in the code, which can lead to clutter.
  • Suggestion: Remove unnecessary using directives to make the code cleaner and easier to maintain.
    // Before
    using BotSharp.Abstraction.Infrastructures;
    // After
    // (remove the line)

Issue 2: Potential Null Reference

  • Description: Usage of nullable objects without checking for null might result in exceptions.
  • Suggestion: Use null-conditional operators (?.) or explicitly check for null to safeguard against null reference exceptions.
    // Before
    var agentService = _services.GetRequiredService<IAgentService>();
    var googleSettings = _services.GetRequiredService<GoogleAiSettings>();
    // After
    var agentService = _services.GetService<IAgentService>();
    var googleSettings = _services?.GetRequiredService<GoogleAiSettings>();

Issue 3: Duplicated Logic in Multi-Modal Handling

  • Description: The handling logic for files and their metadata is repetitive and could be encapsulated into helper methods to reduce redundancy and improve readability.
  • Suggestion: Extract the repeated file handling blocks into utility functions.
    // Before
    contentParts.Add(new Part() { InlineData = new() { /* ... */ } });
    lineParts.Add(new Part() { FileData = new() { /* ... */ } });
    // After
    contentParts.Add(CreatePartFromFile(file));

General Assessment

The code demonstrates good handling of improvements and refactoring to support extended functionalities, especially in dealing with multiple AI providers and adding handling for different types of files. However, attention to detail in resource management and efficiency can further elevate the code quality.

@Oceania2018 Oceania2018 merged commit 1672374 into SciSharp:master May 27, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants