You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:
Security Compliance
⚪
Cross-site scripting
Description: Unescaped rule data (e.g., trigger_name and criteria) is interpolated into a SweetAlert HTML template without explicit sanitization, which could risk XSS if those fields contain HTML. agent-rule.svelte [167-183]
Referred Code
Swal.fire({
title: 'Are you sure?',
html: ` <div> <p>Are you sure you want to generate code script <b>"${rule.trigger_name}_rule.py"</b>?</p> <p>This action will overwrite existing code script if any.</p> </div>`,
icon: 'warning',
showCancelButton: true,
cancelButtonText: 'No',
confirmButtonText: 'Yes'
}).then(async (result) => {
if (result.value) {
generateCodeScript(rule);
}
});
Untrusted markdown rendering
Description: Tooltip and Markdown rendering of rule.json_args uses rawText without explicit sanitization, potentially exposing XSS if json_args originates from untrusted input. agent-rule.svelte [328-381]
Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code
Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code self-documenting
Status: Passed
Generic: Secure Error Handling
Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.
Status: Passed
⚪
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails
Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis and compliance.
Status: Missing audit log: Generating agent code scripts appears to be a critical action but the new UI flow (confirmation + API call) does not add any logging or tracking metadata of who performed it, making auditability uncertain.
Referred Code
function compileCodeScript(rule) {
Swal.fire({
title: 'Are you sure?',
html: ` <div> <p>Are you sure you want to generate code script <b>"${rule.trigger_name}_rule.py"</b>?</p> <p>This action will overwrite existing code script if any.</p> </div>`,
icon: 'warning',
showCancelButton: true,
cancelButtonText: 'No',
confirmButtonText: 'Yes'
}).then(async (result) => {
if (result.value) {
generateCodeScript(rule);
}
});
}
/**
... (clipped 41 lines)
Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management
Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful degradation
Status: Weak error context: The code generation path sets generic success/error texts and swallows specific error details without logging or surfacing actionable context, and does not validate empty criteria before calling the API.
Referred Code
/**
* @param {import("$agentTypes").AgentRule} rule
*/
function generateCodeScript(rule) {
returnnewPromise((resolve, reject) => {
isLoading=true;
generateAgentCodeScript(agent.id, {
text: rule.criteria,
options: {
save_to_db: true,
script_name: `${rule.trigger_name}_rule.py`,
script_type: AgentCodeScriptType.Src,
// to do:// agent_id: agent.id,// template_name: "rule"
}
}).then(res=> {
if (res?.success) {
isLoading=false;
isComplete=true;
successText="Code script has been generated!";
... (clipped19lines)
Generic: Secure Logging Practices
Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.
Status: No logging added: New critical operation to generate and potentially persist code lacks structured internal logging in the added code, so it is unclear whether sensitive fields are excluded and whether events are captured for monitoring.
Referred Code
/**
* @param {import("$agentTypes").AgentRule} rule
*/
function generateCodeScript(rule) {
returnnewPromise((resolve, reject) => {
isLoading=true;
generateAgentCodeScript(agent.id, {
text: rule.criteria,
options: {
save_to_db: true,
script_name: `${rule.trigger_name}_rule.py`,
script_type: AgentCodeScriptType.Src,
// to do:// agent_id: agent.id,// template_name: "rule"
}
}).then(res=> {
if (res?.success) {
isLoading=false;
isComplete=true;
successText="Code script has been generated!";
... (clipped19lines)
Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling
Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent vulnerabilities
Status: Missing validation: The request to generate code uses user-provided rule criteria and script name without explicit client-side validation or sanitization, which may risk unsafe inputs if not validated server-side.
The API call to generateAgentCodeScript is missing required parameters like agent_id and template_name, which are commented out. These should be included in the request payload to ensure the code generation feature functions correctly.
// src/routes/page/agent/[agentId]/agent-components/agent-rule.svelte
function generateCodeScript(rule) {
generateAgentCodeScript(agent.id, {
text: rule.criteria,
options: {
save_to_db: true,
script_name: `${rule.trigger_name}_rule.py`,
script_type: AgentCodeScriptType.Src,
agent_id: agent.id,
template_name: "rule"// Potentially other parameters from CodeProcessOptions type
}
}).then(...)
}
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9
__
Why: This suggestion correctly identifies a critical flaw where the API payload for code generation is incomplete, as evidenced by the // to do: comment, which likely breaks the new feature.
High
General
Improve accessibility for interactive icon
Implement the on:keydown event for the compile icon to trigger the compileCodeScript function when the 'Enter' or 'Space' key is pressed, improving keyboard accessibility.
Why: The suggestion addresses an accessibility issue by making a custom interactive element keyboard-operable, which is an important improvement for usability.
Low
Refactor function to use async/await
Refactor the generateCodeScript function to use async/await with a try/catch block instead of wrapping an existing promise in a new Promise constructor.
-function generateCodeScript(rule) {- return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {- isLoading = true;- generateAgentCodeScript(agent.id, {+async function generateCodeScript(rule) {+ isLoading = true;+ try {+ const res = await generateAgentCodeScript(agent.id, {
text: rule.criteria,
options: {
save_to_db: true,
script_name: `${rule.trigger_name}_rule.py`,
script_type: AgentCodeScriptType.Src,
// to do:
// agent_id: agent.id,
// template_name: "rule"
}
- }).then(res => {- if (res?.success) {- isLoading = false;- isComplete = true;- successText = "Code script has been generated!";- setTimeout(() => {- isComplete = false;- successText = "";- }, duration);- resolve(res);- } else {- throw "error when generating code script.";- }- }).catch(() => {+ });++ if (res?.success) {
isLoading = false;
- isComplete = false;- isError = true;- errorText = "Failed to generate code script.";+ isComplete = true;+ successText = "Code script has been generated!";
setTimeout(() => {
- isError = false;- errorText = "";+ isComplete = false;+ successText = "";
}, duration);
- reject();- });- });+ return res;+ } else {+ throw new Error("Error when generating code script.");+ }+ } catch (error) {+ isLoading = false;+ isComplete = false;+ isError = true;+ errorText = "Failed to generate code script.";+ setTimeout(() => {+ isError = false;+ errorText = "";+ }, duration);+ // Re-throw the error to allow the caller to handle the rejection if needed.+ throw error;+ }
}
Apply / Chat
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5
__
Why: The suggestion correctly identifies the "Promise constructor anti-pattern" and proposes a refactor to async/await, which simplifies the code, improves readability, and aligns with modern asynchronous JavaScript best practices.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PR Type
Enhancement
Description
Add code script generation endpoint integration for agent rules
Implement user context passing through agent detail page hierarchy
Enhance rule criteria UI with textarea and output arguments display
Add responsive styles for mobile utility container layout
Diagram Walkthrough
File Walkthrough
6 files
Add user context and refactor importsIntegrate code generation and enhance rule UIPass user prop to rule componentAdd responsive styles and fix formattingDefine code generation types and rule output argsAdd generateAgentCodeScript API function1 files
Fix component name casing inconsistency2 files
Add code script generation endpoint to skip loaderAdd code script generation endpoint URL