Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Update cdn.json #33

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2020
Merged

Update cdn.json #33

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 20, 2020

Conversation

zhenglaizhang
Copy link

MSFT employees can try out our new experience at OpenAPI Hub - one location for using our validation tools and finding your workflow.

Contribution checklist:

If any further question about AME onboarding or validation tools, please view the FAQ.

ARM API Review Checklist

  • Ensure to check this box if one of the following scenarios meet updates in the PR, so that label “WaitForARMFeedback” will be added automatically to involve ARM API Review. Failure to comply may result in delays for manifest application. Note this does not apply to data plane APIs, all “removals” and “adding a new property” no more require ARM API review.

    • Adding new API(s)
    • Adding a new API version
    • Adding a new service

  • If you are blocked on ARM review and want to get the PR merged with urgency, please get the ARM oncall for reviews (RP Manifest Approvers team under Azure Resource Manager service) from IcM and reach out to them.

Breaking Change Review Checklist

If there are following updates in the PR, ensure to request an approval from API Review Board as defined in the Breaking Change Policy.

  • Removing API(s) in stable version
  • Removing properties in stable version
  • Removing API version(s) in stable version
  • Updating API in stable version with Breaking Change Validation errors
  • Updating API(s) in preview over 1 year

Please follow the link to find more details on PR review process.

@openapi-pipeline-bot
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-bot bot commented Oct 19, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Swagger Generation Artificats

️️✔️~[Staging] ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] 
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] 
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] 
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️~[Staging] LintDiff succeeded [Detail] 
Validation passes for LintDiff.
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@wh02-prototype
Copy link

In Testing, Please Ignore

1 similar comment
@wh02-prototype
Copy link

In Testing, Please Ignore

This was referenced Oct 19, 2020
Closed
Closed
Closed
Closed
@zhenglaizhang zhenglaizhang reopened this Oct 20, 2020
@openapi-pipeline-bot
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-bot bot commented Oct 20, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Swagger Generation Artificats

️️✔️~[Staging] ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] 
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] 
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] 
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️~[Staging] LintDiff succeeded [Detail] 
Validation passes for LintDiff.
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@wh02-prototype
Copy link

In Testing, Please Ignore

@zhenglaizhang zhenglaizhang reopened this Oct 20, 2020
@zhenglaizhang zhenglaizhang reopened this Oct 20, 2020
@openapi-pipeline-bot
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-bot bot commented Oct 20, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Swagger Generation Artificats

️️✔️~[Staging] ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] 
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] 
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] 
There are no breaking changes.
️️✔️~[Staging] LintDiff succeeded [Detail] 
Validation passes for LintDiff.
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@wh02-prototype
Copy link

In Testing, Please Ignore

@zhenglaizhang zhenglaizhang reopened this Oct 20, 2020
@openapi-pipeline-bot
Copy link

Swagger pipeline started successfully, please wait for status update in this comment.

@wh02-prototype
Copy link

In Testing, Please Ignore

@zhenglaizhang zhenglaizhang reopened this Oct 20, 2020
@openapi-pipeline-bot
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-bot bot commented Oct 20, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Swagger pipeline restarted successfully, please wait for status update in this comment.

@wh02-prototype
Copy link

In Testing, Please Ignore

@zhenglaizhang zhenglaizhang reopened this Oct 20, 2020
@zhenglaizhang zhenglaizhang reopened this Oct 20, 2020
@openapi-pipeline-bot
Copy link

openapi-pipeline-bot bot commented Oct 20, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Swagger Generation Artificats

️️✔️~[Staging] SDK azure-sdk-for-net succeeded [Detail]
  • Release - succeeded [Logs]
️️✔️~[Staging] SDK azure-sdk-for-java succeeded [Detail]
  • Release - succeeded [Logs]
️️✔️~[Staging] SDK azure-sdk-for-js succeeded [Detail]
  • Release - succeeded [Logs]
  • ️✔️ Generate from b0ea889 with merge commit 30d753d. SDK Automation 13.0.17
  • ️✔️azure-mgmt-cdn [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] 
    [build_conf] INFO:packaging_tools:Building template azure-mgmt-cdn
    [build_conf] INFO:packaging_tools.conf:Skipping default conf since the file exists
    [build_conf] INFO:packaging_tools:Skipping CHANGELOG.md template, since a previous one was found
    [build_conf] INFO:packaging_tools:Template done azure-mgmt-cdn
    [build_package] /usr/lib/python3.6/distutils/dist.py:261: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'long_description_content_type'
    [build_package]   warnings.warn(msg)
    [build_package] /usr/lib/python3.6/distutils/dist.py:261: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'long_description_content_type'
    [build_package]   warnings.warn(msg)
    [breaking_change_setup] Ignoring mock: markers 'python_version <= '2.7'' don't match your environment
    [ChangeLog] Size of delta 0.003% size of original (original: 78249 chars, delta: 2 chars)
    [ChangeLog]
️️✔️~[Staging] SDK azure-sdk-for-python succeeded [Detail]
  • Release - succeeded [Logs]
  • ️✔️ Generate from b0ea889 with merge commit 30d753d. SDK Automation 13.0.17
  • ️✔️azure-mgmt-cdn [View full logs]  [Release SDK Changes] 
    [build_conf] INFO:packaging_tools:Building template azure-mgmt-cdn
    [build_conf] INFO:packaging_tools.conf:Skipping default conf since the file exists
    [build_conf] INFO:packaging_tools:Skipping CHANGELOG.md template, since a previous one was found
    [build_conf] INFO:packaging_tools:Template done azure-mgmt-cdn
    [build_package] /usr/lib/python3.6/distutils/dist.py:261: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'long_description_content_type'
    [build_package]   warnings.warn(msg)
    [build_package] /usr/lib/python3.6/distutils/dist.py:261: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'long_description_content_type'
    [build_package]   warnings.warn(msg)
    [breaking_change_setup] Ignoring mock: markers 'python_version <= '2.7'' don't match your environment
    [ChangeLog] Size of delta 0.003% size of original (original: 78249 chars, delta: 2 chars)
    [ChangeLog]
️🔄~[Staging] SDK azure-sdk-for-go inProgress [Detail] [Expand]
️⚠️~[Staging] SDK azure-resource-manager-schemas warning [Detail] [Expand]
  • Release - warning [Logs]
  • ⚠️ Generate from b0ea889 with merge commit 30d753d. Schema Automation 13.0.17 
    Failed to find any diff after autorest so no changed packages was found.
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

@wh02-prototype
Copy link

In Testing, Please Ignore

1 similar comment
@wh02-prototype
Copy link

In Testing, Please Ignore

@zhenglaizhang zhenglaizhang reopened this Oct 20, 2020
@zhenglaizhang zhenglaizhang reopened this Oct 20, 2020
@wh02-prototype
Copy link

In Testing, Please Ignore

@zhenglaizhang zhenglaizhang merged commit 30d753d into master Oct 20, 2020
@wh02-prototype
Copy link

In Testing, Please Ignore

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@zhenglaizhang