feat: Audit users.update API endpoint

[gabriellsh]

Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)

Issue(s)

LOG-3

Steps to test or reproduce

Further comments

[dionisio-bot]

Looks like this PR is not ready to merge, because of the following issues:

• This PR is targeting the wrong base branch. It should target 7.6.0, but it targets 7.5.0

Please fix the issues and try again

If you have any trouble, please check the PR guidelines

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 1e260e4

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 36 packages

Name	Type
@rocket.chat/meteor	Minor
@rocket.chat/core-typings	Minor
@rocket.chat/model-typings	Minor
@rocket.chat/models	Minor
@rocket.chat/uikit-playground	Patch
@rocket.chat/api-client	Patch
@rocket.chat/apps	Patch
@rocket.chat/core-services	Patch
@rocket.chat/cron	Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-client	Patch
@rocket.chat/freeswitch	Patch
@rocket.chat/fuselage-ui-kit	Major
@rocket.chat/gazzodown	Major
@rocket.chat/livechat	Patch
@rocket.chat/rest-typings	Minor
@rocket.chat/ui-contexts	Major
@rocket.chat/account-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/authorization-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/ddp-streamer	Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-transcript	Patch
@rocket.chat/presence-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/queue-worker	Patch
@rocket.chat/stream-hub-service	Patch
@rocket.chat/license	Patch
@rocket.chat/omnichannel-services	Patch
@rocket.chat/pdf-worker	Patch
@rocket.chat/presence	Patch
rocketchat-services	Patch
@rocket.chat/instance-status	Patch
@rocket.chat/network-broker	Patch
@rocket.chat/mock-providers	Patch
@rocket.chat/ui-avatar	Major
@rocket.chat/ui-client	Major
@rocket.chat/ui-video-conf	Major
@rocket.chat/ui-voip	Major
@rocket.chat/web-ui-registration	Major

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[github-actions]

PR Preview Action v1.6.0
🚀 View preview at https://RocketChat.github.io/Rocket.Chat/pr-preview/pr-34494/
Built to branch gh-pages at 2025-03-25 16:33 UTC. Preview will be ready when the GitHub Pages deployment is complete.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 59.73%. Comparing base (5cd142b) to head (1e260e4).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #34494   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    59.73%   59.73%           
========================================
  Files         2830     2830           
  Lines        68258    68258           
  Branches     15130    15130           
========================================
  Hits         40772    40772           
  Misses       24877    24877           
  Partials      2609     2609           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	75.92% <66.66%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
2 out of 3 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ tassoevan
✅ gabriellsh
❌ Gabriel Henriques

---

Gabriel Henriques seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[pierre-lehnen-rc]

Not a big deal but I'd prefer if extra data like the active here was passed on from outside instead of adding it automatically whenever the function gets called.
As it is, you're assuming that any place that calls saveUser will also call setUserActiveStatus.