Skip to content

The changes in @internal classes shouldn't be ignored completely #256

@morozov

Description

@morozov

An @internal class still may be used by the consuming code as one of its non-internal parent types. If a breaking change happens in the non-internal subset of the ancestry tree (e.g. the class loses one of its parents), it will affect the consumers of the class even if it's internal.

See doctrine/dbal#4100 (comment).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions