Skip to content

The changes in @internal classes shouldn't be ignored completely #256

Open
@morozov

Description

An @internal class still may be used by the consuming code as one of its non-internal parent types. If a breaking change happens in the non-internal subset of the ancestry tree (e.g. the class loses one of its parents), it will affect the consumers of the class even if it's internal.

See doctrine/dbal#4100 (comment).

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions