Problem
stable-workflow-handler.ts has grown to 1294 lines, making it difficult to maintain and navigate. The file contains multiple responsibilities that should be separated.
Current State
File Size: 1294 lines
Responsibilities:
- Workflow phase handlers (spec, clarify, plan, review, tasks, implement, status)
- Memory operations (learn, context, correct)
- Checkpoint operations (save, resume, list, clear)
- Task decomposition & implementation validation
- Release & onboarding flows
- Utility methods
Proposed Solution
Refactor into multiple focused modules following single responsibility principle:
Option A: Domain-based Split
handlers/
workflow/
- workflow-phase-handler.ts (spec, clarify, plan, review, tasks, implement)
- workflow-status-handler.ts (status, list)
memory/
- memory-handler.ts (learn, context, correct)
checkpoint/
- checkpoint-handler.ts (save, resume, list, clear)
tooling/
- release-handler.ts
- onboard-handler.ts
- constitution-handler.ts
utils/
- handler-utils.ts (common patterns)
Option B: Feature-based Split
handlers/
- workflow-lifecycle-handler.ts (spec → implement flow)
- workflow-support-handler.ts (memory, checkpoints, validation)
- project-management-handler.ts (release, onboard, constitution)
Benefits
- Maintainability: Smaller, focused files easier to understand
- Testability: Each module can be tested independently
- Reusability: Extracted utilities can be shared
- Collaboration: Multiple developers can work in parallel
- Performance: Potential for lazy-loading handlers
Success Criteria
Related
This addresses the architectural concern raised during Issue #8 implementation.
Problem
stable-workflow-handler.tshas grown to 1294 lines, making it difficult to maintain and navigate. The file contains multiple responsibilities that should be separated.Current State
File Size: 1294 lines
Responsibilities:
Proposed Solution
Refactor into multiple focused modules following single responsibility principle:
Option A: Domain-based Split
Option B: Feature-based Split
Benefits
Success Criteria
Related
This addresses the architectural concern raised during Issue #8 implementation.