LIcense change of dependency domain-browser

[thomasballinger]

4d26fb0 a few months ago updated domain-browser semver range from ^4.22.0 to ^5.7.0. 4.22 was the last release of domain-browser licensed MIT; the library is now licensed under the Artistic License.

This is a small library with no dependencies, any interest in vendoring the 60 lines of the last version published under MIT?

[mistic]

@Richienb I think this is a good idea. The Artistic License could be problematic when used in open source projects that mostly rely on MIT licenses. I've came up into that problem as well and for now I've reverted to the v3.0.0 of this plugin because of that.

[Richienb]

It seems be compatible, but not sure https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/licence/compare/Artistic-2.0;MIT

I have asked: https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/15199/can-i-use-an-artistic-license-2-0-library-in-a-mit-license-library

Otherwise, yes, we should fork.

[Richienb]

Downgraded.