Update web components version #293
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request involves version updates for two packages: Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)packages/invoice-dashboard/package.json (2)
The version bump from 0.11.15 to 0.12.0 represents a minor version increase. According to semver, this indicates new features or non-breaking changes. ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the changes in this version bump. Version bump appears to be a formatting fix The change is actually just fixing the version number format from "0.12.00" to "0.12.0", removing an unnecessary trailing zero. This is not a functional version bump but rather a formatting correction. The package 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check for any breaking changes in recent commits
git log --oneline $(git describe --tags --abbrev=0)..HEAD | grep -iE "break|breaking|major"
# Check if other related packages are being updated in sync
fd -e json package.json | xargs grep -l "@requestnetwork" | xargs cat | jq -r '. | select(.name | startswith("@requestnetwork")) | "\(.name): \(.version)"'
Length of output: 501 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check the git diff for package.json to see what changed
git diff HEAD~1 packages/invoice-dashboard/package.json
# Look for related changes in the PR
git log -p --no-merges HEAD~5..HEAD -- packages/invoice-dashboard/
Length of output: 473 Line range hint The package has several core Request Network dependencies locked to specific versions:
Ensure these versions are compatible with the new 0.12.0 release. ✅ Verification successfulLet me gather more information about the compatibility between these versions. Let me also check the changelog or release notes for these packages: Let me try one more verification approach to check for any compatibility information in the repository's documentation: Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response: @RequestNetwork dependencies are coordinated and compatible The versions of @RequestNetwork packages are consistently used across the monorepo:
The CHANGELOG.md entries show these packages were previously upgraded together to version 0.52.0, indicating they are part of a coordinated release strategy. The package-lock.json entries confirm version consistency throughout the dependency tree. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check for version consistency across the monorepo
fd -e json package.json | xargs grep -l "@requestnetwork/payment-detection\|@requestnetwork/payment-processor\|@requestnetwork/request-client.js" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
jq '.dependencies | with_entries(select(.key | startswith("@requestnetwork")))' "$file"
done
Length of output: 1276 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Check package.json files in the @requestnetwork dependencies themselves
fd -g "*/node_modules/@requestnetwork/*/package.json" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
jq '{name: .name, version: .version, peerDependencies: .peerDependencies, dependencies: .dependencies}' "$file" 2>/dev/null
done
Length of output: 70 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Look for CHANGELOG.md files
fd -g "*/node_modules/@requestnetwork/*/CHANGELOG.md" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
head -n 20 "$file" 2>/dev/null
done
Length of output: 70 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for any documentation about version compatibility
rg -i "version|compatibility" -g "*.md" --no-ignore
# Also check root package.json for any workspace or version requirements
if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
echo "=== Root package.json ==="
jq '{workspaces,engines,resolutions}' package.json
fi
# Check if there's a yarn.lock or package-lock.json with dependency tree
if [ -f "yarn.lock" ]; then
echo "=== yarn.lock entries for @requestnetwork ==="
grep -A 5 "@requestnetwork" yarn.lock
elif [ -f "package-lock.json" ]; then
echo "=== package-lock.json entries for @requestnetwork ==="
jq '.. | .["@requestnetwork/payment-detection","@requestnetwork/payment-processor","@requestnetwork/request-client.js"]? // empty' package-lock.json
fi
Length of output: 3703 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Change
0.12.0Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
@requestnetwork/create-invoice-formand@requestnetwork/invoice-dashboardpackages to 0.12.0.Chores