-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
fix: lit and wallet issues #265
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…iew Requests - Added wallet connection and disconnection handling in Create Invoice Form using `watchAccount`. - Improved state management for account and cipher provider in View Requests. - Refactored wallet change logic for better clarity and functionality.
WalkthroughThis pull request encompasses updates to two packages: Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Wallet
participant CreateInvoiceForm
participant InvoiceDashboard
User->>Wallet: Connect Wallet
Wallet-->>CreateInvoiceForm: Wallet Connected
CreateInvoiceForm->>CreateInvoiceForm: Handle Wallet Connection
CreateInvoiceForm->>CreateInvoiceForm: Watch Account Changes
User->>InvoiceDashboard: Load Requests
InvoiceDashboard->>InvoiceDashboard: Validate Wallet and Request Network
InvoiceDashboard->>InvoiceDashboard: Load and Decrypt Requests
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/invoice-dashboard/CHANGELOG.md (2)
5-8: Consider adding more details to the changelog entry.While the entry correctly identifies the area of fix (Lit Encryption and Wallet Connections), it would be more helpful for users and developers to include:
- Specific issues that were fixed
- Impact of the fixes
- Any related changes in behavior
Example format:
- Fix Lit Encryption and Wallet Connections + Fix Lit Encryption and Wallet Connections: + - Improved wallet connection handling in Create Invoice Form + - Enhanced watchAccount integration + - Fixed state management for account and cipher provider
3-8: Consider reviewing the Lit Protocol integration architecture.The changelog history shows multiple iterations of fixes related to Lit Protocol encryption and wallet connections (0.11.8 through 0.11.10). This pattern might indicate underlying architectural challenges that could benefit from a comprehensive review.
Consider:
- Documenting the current architecture
- Identifying common failure points
- Implementing more robust error handling
- Adding integration tests
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
packages/create-invoice-form/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/create-invoice-form/package.json(1 hunks)packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/create-invoice-form.svelte(4 hunks)packages/invoice-dashboard/CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)packages/invoice-dashboard/package.json(1 hunks)packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- packages/create-invoice-form/package.json
- packages/invoice-dashboard/package.json
- packages/create-invoice-form/CHANGELOG.md
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/create-invoice-form.svelte (2)
Learnt from: MantisClone
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#150
File: packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/create-invoice-form.svelte:81-84
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T14:52:33.204Z
Learning: The `getAccount` function from `@wagmi/core` accepts a configuration parameter. When using `wagmiConfig`, it is appropriate to call `getAccount(wagmiConfig)`.
Learnt from: sstefdev
PR: RequestNetwork/web-components#150
File: packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T14:52:33.204Z
Learning: In this codebase, the `watchAccount` function requires `wagmiConfig` as an argument.
🔇 Additional comments (7)
packages/invoice-dashboard/CHANGELOG.md (1)
3-4: LGTM! Version increment follows semantic versioning.
The version bump to 0.11.10 as a patch release is appropriate for bug fixes.
packages/create-invoice-form/src/lib/create-invoice-form.svelte (4)
4-4: LGTM: Import statement includes required wallet management utilities.
The addition of watchAccount and WatchAccountReturnType aligns with the PR's objective to enhance wallet connection handling.
39-39: LGTM: Account initialization follows best practices.
The initialization properly uses wagmiConfig with getAccount() and handles the undefined case, as confirmed by past learnings.
125-139: LGTM: Wallet state management functions are well-structured.
The functions provide a clear separation of concerns:
handleWalletConnection: Updates account statehandleWalletDisconnection: Cleans up resourceshandleWalletChange: Manages state transitions
141-156: LGTM: Lifecycle hooks properly manage wallet state.
The implementation:
- Sets up account watcher on mount
- Uses
tick()to ensure DOM updates complete - Properly cleans up the watcher on component destruction
packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte (2)
112-116: LGTM: Wallet disconnection properly cleans up state.
The implementation follows a clear sequence:
- Reset account state
- Clear requests data
- Clean up cipher provider
387-387: Verify the impact of requiring cipher provider.
The condition !cipherProvider has been added to the early return check. This change might prevent loading requests when the cipher provider is not available.
Run the following script to check if there are any non-encrypted requests that might be affected:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about how the cipher provider is used in request handling.
Adding cipher provider check is correct and necessary
The code shows that the cipher provider is essential for handling encrypted requests. The implementation includes proper fallbacks:
- The cipher provider check is used alongside a UI switch that controls request decryption
- When decryption is disabled (
sliderValue === "off"), the cipher provider is explicitly disabled withenableDecryption(false) - Non-encrypted requests can still be loaded when decryption is disabled
The added check !cipherProvider in the early return is consistent with the codebase's encryption handling design and prevents potential issues when attempting to handle encrypted requests without the necessary provider.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for non-encrypted request handling in the codebase
# Search for request loading without encryption
rg -A 5 "enableDecryption\(false\)"
# Search for places where requests are loaded without cipher provider
rg -A 5 "getRequests.*requestNetwork"
Length of output: 1262
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for cipher provider usage in request handling
rg -A 10 "cipherProvider" packages/invoice-dashboard/src/lib/view-requests.svelte
# Search for request encryption related code
ast-grep --pattern 'fromIdentity($$$)'
Length of output: 2344
Changes
feat: Enhance wallet connection handling in Create Invoice Form and View Requests
watchAccount.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
@requestnetwork/create-invoice-formand@requestnetwork/invoice-dashboardpackages to reflect the latest version changes.Chores