feat: upgrade playground to new payment-widget version
#15
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several changes across multiple files in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- package.json (2 hunks)
- src/components/Playground.tsx (10 hunks)
- src/components/ui/combobox.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/lib/constants.ts (1 hunks)
- src/lib/validation.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (10)
package.json (1)
3-3: Version bump looks good.The increment from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1 is appropriate for adding new features without breaking changes, adhering to semantic versioning principles.
src/lib/validation.ts (1)
65-73: Summary: Fee-related fields successfully added to validation schema.The addition of
feeAddressandfeeAmountto thePropsValidationschema successfully implements the PR objective of introducing new fee-related fields. These changes enhance the playground's functionality by allowing users to specify fee information.The implementation is correct, using appropriate validation rules and default values. Minor suggestions have been made to improve code documentation and error message consistency.
To ensure these changes are properly integrated, please run the following script to check for any usage of these new fields in the codebase:
This will help verify that the new fields are being used as intended throughout the project.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: Fee-related fields are correctly integrated and utilized.
The new fields
feeAddressandfeeAmounthave been successfully added to thePropsValidationschema and are actively used within thePlayground.tsxcomponent. This ensures that fee information can be specified and validated as intended, enhancing the playground's functionality.
src/components/Playground.tsxsrc/lib/validation.ts🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of new fee-related fields in the codebase echo "Checking for feeAddress usage:" rg --type typescript 'feeAddress' echo "\nChecking for feeAmount usage:" rg --type typescript 'feeAmount'Length of output: 280
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of new fee-related fields in the codebase echo "Checking for feeAddress usage in TypeScript files:" rg --type ts,tsx 'feeAddress' echo "\nChecking for feeAmount usage in TypeScript files:" rg --type ts,tsx 'feeAmount'Length of output: 344
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of new fee-related fields in TypeScript files echo "Checking for feeAddress usage in TypeScript files:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'feeAddress' echo "\nChecking for feeAmount usage in TypeScript files:" rg --type ts --type tsx 'feeAmount'Length of output: 352
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of new fee-related fields in TypeScript files using glob patterns echo "Checking for feeAddress usage in TypeScript files (.ts and .tsx):" rg --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" 'feeAddress' echo "\nChecking for feeAmount usage in TypeScript files (.ts and .tsx):" rg --glob "*.ts" --glob "*.tsx" 'feeAmount'Length of output: 2315
src/components/ui/combobox.tsx (4)
32-32: LGTM: Enhancing component flexibility with optional className propThe addition of the optional
classNameprop to theCurrencyComboboxPropsinterface is a good practice. It allows for more flexible styling of the component, enabling users to pass custom classes when needed. This change adheres to React best practices for component customization.
35-39: LGTM: Function signature updated consistently with interface changesThe
CurrencyComboboxfunction signature has been correctly updated to include the newclassNameprop. This change is consistent with theCurrencyComboboxPropsinterface update. The destructuring syntax is used appropriately, and the order of props (register, name, className) is logical.
63-63: LGTM: Proper implementation of className propThe
classNameprop is correctly implemented in theButtoncomponent's class attribute. The use of thecnutility function to combine the default class with any additional classes provided viaclassNameis a good practice. This approach allows for both default styling and custom styling to coexist, enhancing the component's flexibility without breaking its core styling.
Line range hint
32-63: Summary: Successful implementation of className prop enhances component flexibilityThe changes made to the
CurrencyComboboxcomponent successfully implement a newclassNameprop, enhancing the component's styling flexibility. The modifications are consistent across the interface definition, function signature, and prop usage. This improvement allows users of the component to apply custom styles when needed, adhering to React best practices for component customization. The implementation is clean and doesn't introduce any potential issues.src/components/Playground.tsx (4)
44-45: Verify the default value forfeeAddress.Setting the default
feeAddresstoZERO_ADDRESSmay have implications elsewhere in your application logic. IfZERO_ADDRESSsignifies the absence of a fee address, consider whether using an empty string""ornullwould make the intent clearer and prevent potential confusion.
378-388: Ensure consistency in error styling for required fields.The implementation correctly adds a red asterisk to indicate required fields and conditionally applies error styling based on validation errors for the
sellerAddress. Good job maintaining consistency.
397-409: Ensure consistency in error styling for required fields.Similar to
sellerAddress, theamountInUSDfield appropriately indicates that it is required and applies conditional error styling. This enhances user experience by providing clear visual feedback.
496-507: Reevaluate logic for fee-related props inPaymentWidget.The current logic always passes a
feeAddresstoPaymentWidget, defaulting toZERO_ADDRESSwhenformValues.feeAddressis empty. Additionally,feeAmountInUSDis set to0whenfeeAddressisZERO_ADDRESS. This could lead to unintended behavior ifZERO_ADDRESSis treated differently withinPaymentWidget.Consider only passing
feeAddressandfeeAmountInUSDwhen a valid fee is intended:<PaymentWidget ... - feeAddress={ - formValues.feeAddress && formValues.feeAddress.length > 0 - ? formValues.feeAddress - : ZERO_ADDRESS - } - feeAmountInUSD={ - formValues.feeAddress && - formValues.feeAddress.length > 0 && - formValues.feeAddress !== ZERO_ADDRESS - ? formValues.feeAmount - : 0 - } + {...(formValues.feeAddress && formValues.feeAddress !== ZERO_ADDRESS && { + feeAddress: formValues.feeAddress, + feeAmountInUSD: formValues.feeAmount, + })}This approach ensures that
feeAddressandfeeAmountInUSDare only included when a valid fee is specified.
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| export const ZERO_ADDRESS = "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000"; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM! Consider adding a brief comment for clarity.
The addition of the ZERO_ADDRESS constant is a good practice. It provides a centralized definition for the Ethereum zero address, which can be reused throughout the codebase.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose and significance of the zero address in Ethereum. This would enhance code readability and maintainability. Here's a suggested implementation:
+// The Ethereum zero address, often used to represent burning tokens or as a placeholder
export const ZERO_ADDRESS = "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000";📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const ZERO_ADDRESS = "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000"; | |
| // The Ethereum zero address, often used to represent burning tokens or as a placeholder | |
| export const ZERO_ADDRESS = "0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000"; |
| "@radix-ui/react-switch": "^1.1.0", | ||
| "@radix-ui/react-tooltip": "^1.1.2", | ||
| "@requestnetwork/payment-widget": "^0.1.2", | ||
| "@requestnetwork/payment-widget": "^0.2.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Missing Release Information for @requestnetwork/payment-widget v0.2.0
The specified version v0.2.0 of @requestnetwork/payment-widget does not exist in the repository, and no release notes or changelog were found. This update may introduce unverified changes or conflicts.
🔗 Analysis chain
Dependency update aligns with PR objectives.
The update of @requestnetwork/payment-widget from ^0.1.2 to ^0.2.0 directly addresses the main objective of the PR to upgrade the playground to the new version.
To ensure this update doesn't introduce any breaking changes, let's check the changelog or release notes:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in @requestnetwork/payment-widget v0.2.0
# Test: Search for changelog or release notes
rg -i -A 10 "changelog|release notes" README.md CHANGELOG.md || echo "No changelog found in README.md or CHANGELOG.md"
# Test: Check GitHub releases for v0.2.0
gh release view v0.2.0 -R RequestNetwork/payment-widget || echo "GitHub release notes for v0.2.0 not found"
Length of output: 474
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correct repository name and check for release notes and version tag
# Test: Confirm the correct GitHub repository name
gh repo list | grep -i "payment-widget" || echo "Repository containing 'payment-widget' not found."
# Test: Search for documentation files that might contain release notes
fd "release" --type f --extension md | xargs grep -i "v0.2.0" || echo "No release notes found in documentation files."
# Test: Verify if the version tag v0.2.0 exists in the repository
git tag | grep "^v0.2.0$" || echo "Version tag v0.2.0 does not exist in the repository."
Length of output: 460
| feeAddress: z | ||
| .string() | ||
| .refine(isEthereumAddress, "Invalid fee address") | ||
| .optional() | ||
| .nullable(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM with a minor suggestion.
The feeAddress property is well-defined and aligns with the PR objectives. The use of isEthereumAddress for validation is appropriate.
Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the feeAddress field for better code documentation. For example:
// The Ethereum address where the fee will be sent
feeAddress: z
.string()
.refine(isEthereumAddress, "Invalid fee address")
.optional()
.nullable(),| feeAmount: z | ||
| .number() | ||
| .gte(0, "Fee amount needs to be higher than 0") | ||
| .default(0), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
LGTM with minor suggestions.
The feeAmount property is well-defined and aligns with the PR objectives. The use of gte(0) ensures a non-negative fee amount.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add a comment explaining the purpose of the
feeAmountfield:
// The amount of the fee to be applied
feeAmount: z
.number()
.gte(0, "Fee amount must be 0 or higher")
.default(0),- Update the error message to be consistent with the validation:
Change"Fee amount needs to be higher than 0"to"Fee amount must be 0 or higher".
These changes will improve code documentation and make the error message more accurate.
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (formValues.feeAddress?.length === 0) { | ||
| setValue("feeAddress", ZERO_ADDRESS); | ||
| setValue("feeAmount", 0); | ||
| } | ||
| }, [formValues.feeAddress, formValues.feeAmount]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid unnecessary re-renders by correcting useEffect dependencies.
The useEffect hook depends on both formValues.feeAddress and formValues.feeAmount, but only formValues.feeAddress is used in the effect's logic. Including formValues.feeAmount may cause unnecessary re-renders.
Apply this diff to adjust the dependency array:
- }, [formValues.feeAddress, formValues.feeAmount]);
+ }, [formValues.feeAddress]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| useEffect(() => { | |
| if (formValues.feeAddress?.length === 0) { | |
| setValue("feeAddress", ZERO_ADDRESS); | |
| setValue("feeAmount", 0); | |
| } | |
| }, [formValues.feeAddress, formValues.feeAmount]); | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| if (formValues.feeAddress?.length === 0) { | |
| setValue("feeAddress", ZERO_ADDRESS); | |
| setValue("feeAmount", 0); | |
| } | |
| }, [formValues.feeAddress]); |
| formValues.feeAddress && | ||
| formValues.feeAddress !== ZERO_ADDRESS && | ||
| `feeAddress="${formValues.feeAddress}"`, | ||
| formValues.feeAmount && `feeAmountInUSD={${formValues.feeAmount}}`, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix omission of feeAmountInUSD when the amount is zero.
The conditional check formValues.feeAmount && will exclude feeAmountInUSD from the generated integration code when feeAmount is 0, because 0 is a falsy value in JavaScript. This might lead to unintended behavior if a fee amount of zero is a valid input.
Apply this diff to ensure feeAmountInUSD is included even when feeAmount is 0:
- formValues.feeAmount && `feeAmountInUSD={${formValues.feeAmount}}`,
+ (formValues.feeAmount !== undefined && formValues.feeAmount !== null) && `feeAmountInUSD={${formValues.feeAmount}}`,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| formValues.feeAddress && | |
| formValues.feeAddress !== ZERO_ADDRESS && | |
| `feeAddress="${formValues.feeAddress}"`, | |
| formValues.feeAmount && `feeAmountInUSD={${formValues.feeAmount}}`, | |
| formValues.feeAddress && | |
| formValues.feeAddress !== ZERO_ADDRESS && | |
| `feeAddress="${formValues.feeAddress}"`, | |
| (formValues.feeAmount !== undefined && formValues.feeAmount !== null) && `feeAmountInUSD={${formValues.feeAmount}}`, |
| <Input | ||
| placeholder="0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890" | ||
| {...register("feeAddress")} | ||
| /> | ||
| {errors.feeAddress?.message && ( | ||
| <Error>{errors.feeAddress.message}</Error> | ||
| )} | ||
| <Label>Fee Amount in USD</Label> | ||
| <Input | ||
| placeholder="25.55" | ||
| {...register("feeAmount", { | ||
| valueAsNumber: true, | ||
| })} | ||
| /> | ||
| {errors.feeAmount?.message && ( | ||
| <Error>{errors.feeAmount.message}</Error> | ||
| )} | ||
| </div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add conditional error styling to Fee Address and Fee Amount inputs.
The feeAddress and feeAmount inputs currently lack conditional styling to indicate validation errors, which may lead to a less intuitive user experience.
Apply this diff to include error styling:
<Input
placeholder="0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890"
{...register("feeAddress")}
+ className={cn(
+ "border-2",
+ errors.feeAddress ? "border-red-500" : "border-gray-200"
+ )}
/>
...
<Input
placeholder="25.55"
{...register("feeAmount", {
valueAsNumber: true,
})}
+ className={cn(
+ "border-2",
+ errors.feeAmount ? "border-red-500" : "border-gray-200"
+ )}
/>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <Input | |
| placeholder="0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890" | |
| {...register("feeAddress")} | |
| /> | |
| {errors.feeAddress?.message && ( | |
| <Error>{errors.feeAddress.message}</Error> | |
| )} | |
| <Label>Fee Amount in USD</Label> | |
| <Input | |
| placeholder="25.55" | |
| {...register("feeAmount", { | |
| valueAsNumber: true, | |
| })} | |
| /> | |
| {errors.feeAmount?.message && ( | |
| <Error>{errors.feeAmount.message}</Error> | |
| )} | |
| </div> | |
| <Input | |
| placeholder="0x1234567890123456789012345678901234567890" | |
| {...register("feeAddress")} | |
| className={cn( | |
| "border-2", | |
| errors.feeAddress ? "border-red-500" : "border-gray-200" | |
| )} | |
| /> | |
| {errors.feeAddress?.message && ( | |
| <Error>{errors.feeAddress.message}</Error> | |
| )} | |
| <Label>Fee Amount in USD</Label> | |
| <Input | |
| placeholder="25.55" | |
| {...register("feeAmount", { | |
| valueAsNumber: true, | |
| })} | |
| className={cn( | |
| "border-2", | |
| errors.feeAmount ? "border-red-500" : "border-gray-200" | |
| )} | |
| /> | |
| {errors.feeAmount?.message && ( | |
| <Error>{errors.feeAmount.message}</Error> | |
| )} | |
| </div> |
Fee AmountandFee Addressfields to playgroundOut of scope:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
feeAddressandfeeAmount.classNameproperty to the CurrencyCombobox for enhanced styling flexibility.ZERO_ADDRESSto improve address handling.Bug Fixes
Documentation
feeAddressandfeeAmountproperties.