Skip to content

Conversation

@tristan-f-r
Copy link
Collaborator

@tristan-f-r tristan-f-r commented Jul 21, 2025

Closes #334. While this adds a feature, I'm considering this a 'bug' since it would have broken high alphas otherwise. This is also an interesting one, as it kind of acts like #316 but for RWR calls.

@tristan-f-r tristan-f-r added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 21, 2025
@tristan-f-r tristan-f-r changed the title fix: add max_iters to rwr fix(rwr): add max_iters Jul 21, 2025
@tristan-f-r tristan-f-r added bug Something isn't working and removed enhancement New feature or request labels Jul 21, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the merge-conflict This PR has merge conflicts. label Oct 3, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the merge-conflict This PR has merge conflicts. label Oct 4, 2025
@read-the-docs-community
Copy link

Documentation build overview

📚 spras | 🛠️ Build #29817298 | 📁 Comparing fb35485 against latest (d569e4e)


🔍 Preview build

Show files changed (1 files in total): 📝 1 modified | ➕ 0 added | ➖ 0 deleted
File Status
fordevs/spras.html 📝 modified

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

RWR doesn't work on datasets when using a large alpha

1 participant