Skip to content

Make sure 'summary' field changes are also recorded#25

Merged
PaulWay merged 1 commit intomainfrom
advisor_double_check_summary_generic_different
Aug 11, 2025
Merged

Make sure 'summary' field changes are also recorded#25
PaulWay merged 1 commit intomainfrom
advisor_double_check_summary_generic_different

Conversation

@PaulWay
Copy link
Collaborator

@PaulWay PaulWay commented Aug 11, 2025

In investigating why the 'summary' field in many rules is the same as the
'generic' field, I found that changes to the 'summary' field were not being
tracked in trying to determine whether to update the rule model of an
existing rule. This fix makes sure that fields we check and possibly modify
are always included in the list of fields checked for updates.

(Hopefully) fixes RHINENG-17698

Signed-off-by: Paul Wayper <paulway@redhat.com>
@PaulWay PaulWay self-assigned this Aug 11, 2025
@PaulWay PaulWay added bug Something isn't working Advisor The 'Advisor' component of the code. API The API components of both Advisor and Tasks labels Aug 11, 2025
@PaulWay PaulWay merged commit 08ab883 into main Aug 11, 2025
2 checks passed
@PaulWay PaulWay deleted the advisor_double_check_summary_generic_different branch August 11, 2025 06:36
PaulWay added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2025
In investigating why the 'summary' field in many rules is the same as the
'generic' field, I found that changes to the 'summary' field were not being
tracked in trying to determine whether to update the rule model of an
existing rule. This fix makes sure that fields we check and possibly modify
are always included in the list of fields checked for updates.

(Hopefully) fixes RHINENG-17698

Signed-off-by: Paul Wayper <paulway@redhat.com>
PaulWay added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2025
In investigating why the 'summary' field in many rules is the same as the
'generic' field, I found that changes to the 'summary' field were not being
tracked in trying to determine whether to update the rule model of an
existing rule. This fix makes sure that fields we check and possibly modify
are always included in the list of fields checked for updates.

(Hopefully) fixes RHINENG-17698

Signed-off-by: Paul Wayper <paulway@redhat.com>
PaulWay added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2026
In investigating why the 'summary' field in many rules is the same as the
'generic' field, I found that changes to the 'summary' field were not being
tracked in trying to determine whether to update the rule model of an
existing rule. This fix makes sure that fields we check and possibly modify
are always included in the list of fields checked for updates.

(Hopefully) fixes RHINENG-17698

Signed-off-by: Paul Wayper <paulway@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Advisor The 'Advisor' component of the code. API The API components of both Advisor and Tasks bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants