feature: add function for create request card#999
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughA new asynchronous function, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant RequestCardComponent
participant Helpers
participant DOM
participant DataSource
Caller->>RequestCardComponent: createRequestCardComponent({data, ...})
RequestCardComponent->>Helpers: Normalize and calculate dates
RequestCardComponent->>Helpers: Calculate metrics (deadlines, days, etc.)
RequestCardComponent->>DOM: Create and configure DOM elements
alt isExtensionRequest
RequestCardComponent->>DataSource: Fetch task details asynchronously
end
RequestCardComponent->>DOM: Attach event listeners
RequestCardComponent->>Helpers: Build summary, date, and text containers
Note over RequestCardComponent: Elements prepared for further use
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
components/request-card/script.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
components/request-card/script.js (1)
extension-requests/script.js (3)
renderLogRecord(17-17)reasonInput(1180-1189)reasonInputError(1190-1197)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
components/request-card/script.js
[error] 77-77: Template literals are preferred over string concatenation.
Unsafe fix: Use a template literal.
(lint/style/useTemplate)
[error] 33-33: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'assigneeNameElement' is only assigned here.
(lint/style/useConst)
[error] 34-34: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'assigneeImage' is only assigned here.
(lint/style/useConst)
[error] 35-35: This let declares a variable that is only assigned once.
'taskStatusValue' is only assigned here.
(lint/style/useConst)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: test
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/request-card/script.js (3)
4-7: Unused parameters
currentUser,requestUser, anduserStatusMapare accepted but never referenced. Either use them or drop them from the signature to avoid misleading future readers.
250-266: Constant referenceICON_ARROW_DOWNmust be imported or globally definedIf the constant is declared in another module, ensure it’s imported; otherwise this will throw a ReferenceError in strict mode.
164-167: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Use template literals instead of string concatenation
Biome flagged this; switching to a template literal improves readability and prevents inadvertent whitespace bugs.
-innerText: ` ${requestedDaysAgo}`, +innerText: ` ${requestedDaysAgo}`,(You can also drop the leading space and use CSS for spacing.)
Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
AnujChhikara
force-pushed
the
feature/create-request-card
branch
from
b50020f to
cf18699
Compare
Deploying dashboard-rds with
|
| Latest commit: |
610ca18
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://081ab674.dashboard-rds.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://feature-create-request-card.dashboard-rds.pages.dev |
|
Hello @AnujChhikara, please link the test PR in the description |
components/request-card/script.js
Outdated
|
|
||
| const taskDataPromise = isExtensionRequest | ||
| ? getTaskDetails(data.taskId) | ||
| : Promise.resolve({ taskData: null }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Task details are only needed for extension requests.
For other request types, return a resolved promise with null taskData to avoid unnecessary API calls.
Co-authored-by: Pankaj <pankajshadev@gmail.com>
pankajjs
left a comment
pankajjs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All my comments and suggestions have been addressed. Therefore approving it.
AnujChhikara
dismissed stale reviews from MayankBansal12 and pankajjs
via
610ca18
6 participants
Date: 11 May 2025
Developer Name: @AnujChhikara
Issue Ticket Number
Description
createRequestCardComponentrefactoring, focusing on the creation of core UI elements.Note for reviewer: No design changes are being made to the extension card, so most of the implementation is reused from the existing code.
Documentation Updated?
Under Feature Flag
Database Changes
Breaking Changes
Development Tested?
Screenshots
Screenshot 1
brave_Wvd4QGQdA8.mp4
brave_5ZdF3b4Crh.mp4
brave_6dHlJo2kGe.mp4
brave_cMuGGLoJBQ.mp4
brave_UHzBMcVK3p.mp4
Test Coverage
Screenshot 1
Additional Notes
Test PR: #994