Fix: Disable discord-actions/invite routes#2435
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughA new Express middleware function, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant ExpressServer
participant disableRoute
Client->>ExpressServer: Request to /invite (GET or POST)
ExpressServer->>disableRoute: Passes request to middleware
disableRoute-->>Client: Responds with "Route temporarily disabled" error
Note over ExpressServer,disableRoute: No further middleware or handler is called
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![graphite-app[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/158384?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
middlewares/shortCircuit.ts
Outdated
|
|
||
| export const disableRoute = (_req: CustomRequest, res: CustomResponse, _next: NextFunction) => { | ||
| return res.boom.serverUnavailable( | ||
| "This route has been temporally been disabled. If you need please react out to the team." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are two typos in the error message:
temporallyshould betemporarilyreact outshould bereach out
Suggested correction:
"This route has been temporarily disabled. If you need help, please reach out to the team."
| "This route has been temporally been disabled. If you need please react out to the team." | |
| "This route has been temporarily disabled. If you need help, please reach out to the team." |
Spotted by Diamond
Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
middlewares/shortCircuit.ts(1 hunks)routes/discordactions.js(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
routes/discordactions.js (2)
controllers/discordactions.js (2)
getUserDiscordInvite(535-558)generateInviteForUser(491-533)middlewares/shortCircuit.ts (1)
disableRoute(4-8)
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
routes/discordactions.js
[failure] 45-45: Missing rate limiting
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
[failure] 50-50: Missing rate limiting
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build (22.10.0)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
middlewares/shortCircuit.ts (1)
1-8: Excellent approach for temporarily disabling routes.The middleware correctly short-circuits requests by not calling
next(), ensuring that subsequent middlewares and controllers are not executed. The use ofboom.serverUnavailableprovides an appropriate HTTP 503 status code for temporarily disabled services.routes/discordactions.js (4)
34-34: LGTM!The import statement correctly imports the
disableRoutemiddleware from the new shortCircuit module.
41-45: Excellent implementation of route disabling.The
disableRoutemiddleware is correctly positioned as the first middleware, ensuring requests are blocked before authentication and other processing occurs. The comment provides good context by referencing the related issue.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 45-45: Missing rate limiting
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
46-50: Consistent and correct implementation.The POST route follows the same pattern as the GET route, with
disableRouteas the first middleware and appropriate documentation commenting.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 50-50: Missing rate limiting
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
45-45: Static analysis warnings about rate limiting can be ignored.The CodeQL warnings about missing rate limiting are not relevant since these routes are intentionally disabled and will return HTTP 503 immediately without processing the request.
Also applies to: 50-50
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
[failure] 45-45: Missing rate limiting
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
This route handler performs authorization, but is not rate-limited.
| export const disableRoute = (_req: CustomRequest, res: CustomResponse, _next: NextFunction) => { | ||
| return res.boom.serverUnavailable( | ||
| "This route has been temporally been disabled. If you need please react out to the team." | ||
| ); | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typos in the error message.
The middleware implementation is correct for disabling routes, but there are two typos in the error message that should be fixed.
Apply this diff to fix the typos:
- "This route has been temporally been disabled. If you need please react out to the team."
+ "This route has been temporarily disabled. If you need assistance, please reach out to the team."📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| export const disableRoute = (_req: CustomRequest, res: CustomResponse, _next: NextFunction) => { | |
| return res.boom.serverUnavailable( | |
| "This route has been temporally been disabled. If you need please react out to the team." | |
| ); | |
| }; | |
| export const disableRoute = (_req: CustomRequest, res: CustomResponse, _next: NextFunction) => { | |
| return res.boom.serverUnavailable( | |
| "This route has been temporarily disabled. If you need assistance, please reach out to the team." | |
| ); | |
| }; |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In middlewares/shortCircuit.ts lines 4 to 8, fix the typos in the error message
string by changing "temporally" to "temporarily" and "react out" to "reach out"
to improve clarity and professionalism in the response sent by the disableRoute
middleware.
middlewares/shortCircuit.ts
Outdated
|
|
||
| export const disableRoute = (_req: CustomRequest, res: CustomResponse, _next: NextFunction) => { | ||
| return res.boom.serverUnavailable( | ||
| "This route has been temporarily been disabled. If you need help, please reach out to the team." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's a grammatical error in the error message - the word "been" appears twice. The message should be either "This route has been temporarily disabled" or "This route has temporarily been disabled" for correct grammar.
| "This route has been temporarily been disabled. If you need help, please reach out to the team." | |
| "This route has been temporarily disabled. If you need help, please reach out to the team." |
Spotted by Diamond
Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.
* feat: Add short-circuit middleware to disable invite routes temporarily * fix: Temporarily skip tests for invite routes in Discord actions * fix: Correct wording in server unavailable message for disabled route
…tes-routes Fix: Disable discord-actions/invite routes (#2435)
* feat: Add short-circuit middleware to disable invite routes temporarily * fix: Temporarily skip tests for invite routes in Discord actions * fix: Correct wording in server unavailable message for disabled route
1 participant
Date: 31-May-2025
Developer Name: @prakashchoudhary07
Issue Ticket Number
RealDevSquad/todo-action-items#269
Description
Disabled Discord invite routes, as there is a bug which lets users generate discord links
Documentation Updated?
Under Feature Flag
Database Changes
Breaking Changes
Development Tested?
Screenshots
Screenshot 1
Test Coverage
Screenshot 1
Additional Notes