Conversation
|
Based on your review schedule, I'll hold off on reviewing this PR until it's marked as ready for review. If you'd like me to take a look now, comment
|
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. Important Review skippedAuto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughRemoves legacy mocks for tasks and teams, adds new typed mock data modules for labels, tasks, teams, users, and watchlist. Refactors MSW initialization into a provider with environment gating and readiness state. Removes MSW bootstrap from app layout. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant AppRoot as App Root
participant Provider as MockServiceWorkerProvider
participant MSW as enableMocking()
AppRoot->>Provider: Render with {children}
alt NODE_ENV !== 'development'
Provider-->>AppRoot: Render children immediately
else NODE_ENV === 'development'
Provider->>MSW: enableMocking()
MSW-->>Provider: ready
Provider-->>AppRoot: Render children (after isMswReady)
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)Type Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
AnujChhikara
force-pushed
the
chore/msw-mock-data
branch
from
6118a4e to
bb2586f
Compare
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review by Korbit AI
Korbit automatically attempts to detect when you fix issues in new commits.
| Category | Issue | Status |
|---|---|---|
 |
Invalid React Node Type in Loading State ▹ view | ✅ Fix detected |
 |
Component Has Multiple Responsibilities ▹ view | ✅ Fix detected |
|
Repetitive Assignee Object Structure ▹ view | ✅ Fix detected |
|
Task Data Structure Duplication ▹ view | ✅ Fix detected |
Files scanned
| File Path | Reviewed |
|---|---|
| app/layout.tsx | ✅ |
| components/msw-provider.tsx | ✅ |
| mocks/data/users.mock.ts | ✅ |
| mocks/data/labels.mock.ts | ✅ |
| mocks/data/watchlist.mock.ts | ✅ |
| mocks/data/teams.mock.ts | ✅ |
| mocks/data/tasks.mock.ts | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 12
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
💡 Knowledge Base configuration:
- MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
__mocks__/Task.ts(0 hunks)__mocks__/Team.ts(0 hunks)__mocks__/data/labels.mock.ts(1 hunks)__mocks__/data/tasks.mock.ts(1 hunks)__mocks__/data/teams.mock.ts(1 hunks)__mocks__/data/users.mock.ts(1 hunks)__mocks__/data/watchlist.mock.ts(1 hunks)app/layout.tsx(0 hunks)components/msw-provider.tsx(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- mocks/Team.ts
- app/layout.tsx
- mocks/Task.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (2)
__mocks__/data/watchlist.mock.ts (1)
api/tasks/tasks.types.ts (1)
TWatchListTask(91-106)
components/msw-provider.tsx (1)
__mocks__/init.ts (1)
enableMocking(3-37)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
__mocks__/data/users.mock.ts (1)
1-39: LGTM! Well-structured mock data module.The implementation correctly follows the established mock pattern with proper type definitions and realistic user data. The TMockUserProfileResponse type appropriately models an API response structure.
components/msw-provider.tsx (3)
4-6: Props typing is good; minimal and idiomaticUsing PropsWithChildren on the destructured param is concise and correct. With the type-only import tweak above, this remains clean.
19-20: LGTM: Children rendering path is straightforwardFragment-wrapped children is fine here; no extra nodes added to the tree.
13-14: No additional enableMocking invocations found
Verified viargthat the only runtime call to enableMocking() is in components/msw-provider.tsx (no other call sites exist outside its definition). With the updated effect now gated onprocess.env.NODE_ENV === 'development', MSW initialization will not run in production.
![graphite-app[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/158384?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
AnujChhikara
force-pushed
the
chore/msw-mock-data
branch
from
1f58b29 to
01183f6
Compare
| const isMswReady = useMswInitialization() | ||
|
|
||
| if (process.env.NODE_ENV !== 'development') return children | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Updated the initialization flow to ensure MSW is properly set up before any API calls are made.
| import type { Metadata } from 'next' | ||
| import { Inter } from 'next/font/google' | ||
| import './globals.css' | ||
| import { enableMocking } from '@/__mocks__/init' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Removed this since MSW is already being initialized in the provider that wraps the entire project.
* refactor(mocks): remove unused Task and Team mock files * fix(mocks): start mocking before API calls to prevent race conditions * refactor(mocks): export handlers * refactor(mocks): enhance task labels handling in mock data * refactor(mocks): integrate user assignment in task creation for mock data * refactor(mocks): improve error handling and response structure in mock API handlers
iamitprakash
dismissed stale reviews from Achintya-Chatterjee and Hariom01010
via
1d749e1
4 participants
Date: 15 Aug, 2025
Developer Name: @AnujChhikara
Issue Ticket Number
Description
Added mock data for the MSW handlers.
The PR appears slightly larger in size because it mainly consists of mock data files, not new logic or feature changes.
Documentation Updated?
Under Feature Flag
Database Changes
Breaking Changes
Development Tested?
Screenshots
Screenshot 1
screen-recording-2025-08-18-at-10852-pm_fvOZ5bHR.mp4
Test Coverage
Screenshot 1
Additional Notes
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Add mock data and handlers for labels, tasks, teams, users, and watchlist in the MSW setup and initialize MSW conditionally in a new
MockServiceWorkerProvider.Why are these changes being made?
These changes are implemented to facilitate development and testing by simulating API endpoints and responses using Mock Service Worker (MSW). This approach enhances testing efficiency and reliability, as the mock data and handlers enable simulating realistic interactions without the need for live server communication. Additionally, the conditional initialization of MSW ensures it operates only in development environments to prevent interference in production.