Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThis update introduces a new "Join Team by Invite Code" feature, refactors team API types and methods to use a unified Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant JoinTeamComponent
participant TeamsApi
participant Server
participant Router
participant Toast
User->>JoinTeamComponent: Enter invite code, submit form
JoinTeamComponent->>TeamsApi: joinTeamByInviteCode(inviteCode)
TeamsApi->>Server: POST /v1/teams/join-by-invite
Server-->>TeamsApi: TeamDto response
TeamsApi-->>JoinTeamComponent: TeamDto
JoinTeamComponent->>Toast: Show success or error
JoinTeamComponent->>Router: Navigate to /teams/{teamId}/todos (on success)
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
api/teams/teams.api.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.30.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-react-hooks". (The package "eslint-plugin-react-hooks" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "eslint-plugin-react-hooks" was referenced from the config file in " » eslint-config-next/core-web-vitals » /node_modules/.pnpm/eslint-config-next@15.3.5_eslint-plugin-import-x@4.16.1_@typescript-eslint+utils@8.36.0_79fa352f41e97200dfc66b7389b5a599/node_modules/eslint-config-next/index.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please see https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/troubleshooting. app/(internal-routes)/teams/join/page.tsxOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.30.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-react-hooks". (The package "eslint-plugin-react-hooks" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "eslint-plugin-react-hooks" was referenced from the config file in " » eslint-config-next/core-web-vitals » /node_modules/.pnpm/eslint-config-next@15.3.5_eslint-plugin-import-x@4.16.1_@typescript-eslint+utils@8.36.0_79fa352f41e97200dfc66b7389b5a599/node_modules/eslint-config-next/index.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please see https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/troubleshooting. api/teams/teams.type.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.30.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-react-hooks". (The package "eslint-plugin-react-hooks" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "eslint-plugin-react-hooks" was referenced from the config file in " » eslint-config-next/core-web-vitals » /node_modules/.pnpm/eslint-config-next@15.3.5_eslint-plugin-import-x@4.16.1_@typescript-eslint+utils@8.36.0_79fa352f41e97200dfc66b7389b5a599/node_modules/eslint-config-next/index.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please see https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/troubleshooting.
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (10)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
coderabbitai
bot
added
the
feature task
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review by Korbit AI
Korbit automatically attempts to detect when you fix issues in new commits.
| Category | Issue | Status |
|---|---|---|
 |
Excessive Cache Invalidation ▹ view | |
 |
Missing Invite Code Input Validation ▹ view | |
 |
Insufficient Invite Code Validation ▹ view | |
 |
Lost Error Context in Mutation Error Handler ▹ view | |
|
Missing Invite Code Validation ▹ view | |
|
Nullable users array contradicts team requirements ▹ view |
Files scanned
| File Path | Reviewed |
|---|---|
| app/(internal-routes)/teams/join/page.tsx | ✅ |
| components/Animated-logo.tsx | ✅ |
| api/teams/teams.type.ts | ✅ |
| api/teams/teams.api.ts | ✅ |
| modules/landing-page/landing-footer.tsx | ✅ |
| modules/teams/join-team.tsx | ✅ |
| components/signin-button.tsx | ✅ |
| components/app-sidebar.tsx | ✅ |
| modules/landing-page/landing-dashboard-overview.tsx | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
| mutationFn: TeamsApi.joinTeamByInviteCode.fn, | ||
| onSuccess: (data) => { | ||
| toast.success(`Joined team ${data.name}`) | ||
| queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: TeamsApi.getTeams.key }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Excessive Cache Invalidation 
Tell me more
What is the issue?
Invalidating the entire teams query cache when only a single team was added is inefficient.
Why this matters
This causes unnecessary refetching of all teams data when only the newly joined team needs to be added to the cache.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Instead of invalidating the entire teams cache, use setQueryData to update the cache with the new team data:
queryClient.setQueryData(TeamsApi.getTeams.key, (old: Team[]) => [...old, data])Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| const [inviteCode, setInviteCode] = useState('') | ||
|
|
||
| const joinByInviteCodeMutation = useMutation({ | ||
| mutationFn: TeamsApi.joinTeamByInviteCode.fn, | ||
| onSuccess: (data) => { | ||
| toast.success(`Joined team ${data.name}`) | ||
| queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: TeamsApi.getTeams.key }) | ||
| router.push(`/teams/${data.id}/todos`) | ||
| }, | ||
| onError: () => { | ||
| toast.error('Failed to join team, please try again later') | ||
| }, | ||
| }) | ||
|
|
||
| const handleFormSubmission = (e: React.FormEvent<HTMLFormElement>) => { | ||
| e.preventDefault() | ||
| if (!inviteCode) { | ||
| toast.error('Please enter an invite code') | ||
| return | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| joinByInviteCodeMutation.mutate({ inviteCode }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing Invite Code Input Validation 
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The invite code input is not validated or sanitized before being sent to the API.
Why this matters
Without input validation, malicious users could potentially submit specially crafted invite codes that might lead to injection attacks or other security vulnerabilities on the server side.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
const handleFormSubmission = (e: React.FormEvent<HTMLFormElement>) => {
e.preventDefault()
if (!inviteCode) {
toast.error('Please enter an invite code')
return
}
// Add input validation
if (!/^[a-zA-Z0-9-]{6,}$/.test(inviteCode)) {
toast.error('Invalid invite code format')
return
}
joinByInviteCodeMutation.mutate({ inviteCode })
}Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| if (!inviteCode) { | ||
| toast.error('Please enter an invite code') | ||
| return | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Insufficient Invite Code Validation 
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The invite code validation only checks if the code is empty but doesn't validate the format or length of the code.
Why this matters
Invalid invite code formats could reach the server unnecessarily, causing failed API calls that could be prevented client-side.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Add proper validation before submission:
const isValidInviteCode = (code: string) => {
return code.length === 8 && /^[A-Z0-9]+$/.test(code) // Adjust pattern as per actual requirements
}
const handleFormSubmission = (e: React.FormEvent<HTMLFormElement>) => {
e.preventDefault()
if (!inviteCode) {
toast.error('Please enter an invite code')
return
}
if (!isValidInviteCode(inviteCode)) {
toast.error('Please enter a valid invite code')
return
}
joinByInviteCodeMutation.mutate({ inviteCode })
}Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| onError: () => { | ||
| toast.error('Failed to join team, please try again later') | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Lost Error Context in Mutation Error Handler 
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The error callback loses the error context by not utilizing the error information provided by the mutation.
Why this matters
Without passing the error details to the toast message, debugging becomes more difficult as developers won't know the specific reason for the failure.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Include the error information in the error toast for better debugging:
onError: (error: Error) => {
toast.error(`Failed to join team: ${error.message}`)
}Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| fn: async ({ inviteCode }: { inviteCode: string }): Promise<TeamDto> => { | ||
| const { data } = await apiClient.post<TeamDto>(`/v1/teams/join-by-invite`, { | ||
| invite_code: inviteCode, | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing Invite Code Validation
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The inviteCode parameter is accepted without validation before being sent to the server, potentially allowing malformed or malicious invite codes.
Why this matters
Invalid invite codes could potentially be used for brute force attacks or could contain malicious payloads that might exploit server vulnerabilities.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
// Add input validation for invite code
if (!inviteCode.match(/^[a-zA-Z0-9-_]{8,32}$/)) { // adjust pattern as per actual invite code format
throw new Error('Invalid invite code format');
}
const { data } = await apiClient.post<TeamDto>(`/v1/teams/join-by-invite`, {
invite_code: inviteCode,
});Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| | 'created_at' | ||
| | 'updated_at' | ||
| > & { | ||
| users: { id: string; name: string; tasksAssignedCount?: number; addedOn?: string }[] | null |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nullable users array contradicts team requirements
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The users array in TeamDto can be null, which doesn't align with the team joining functionality's requirement to always have at least one user (the creator).
Why this matters
Having a null users array could lead to UI errors when displaying team members, as there should always be at least an empty array to represent no additional members beyond the creator.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Change the users type to be non-nullable with a default empty array:
users: { id: string; name: string; tasksAssignedCount?: number; addedOn?: string }[]Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
1 participant
Date: 19 July 2025
Developer Name: yash raj
Issue Ticket Number
Description
Documentation Updated?
Under Feature Flag
Database Changes
Breaking Changes
Development Tested?
Screenshots
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Add functionality for users to join teams using an invite code and refactor associated components for improved usability in the application.
Why are these changes being made?
This change allows users to join teams using a unique invite code, enhancing team collaboration capabilities. The use of a new
joinTeamByInviteCodeendpoint, together with a dedicatedJoinTeamcomponent, provides a streamlined and user-friendly interface. Additionally, related type definitions and UI components were refactored to better integrate this functionality within the existing application structure.