Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughA new task reassignment feature was implemented, including API support, type definitions, and React components for UI interaction. The team tasks table was refactored to use a custom implementation with detailed row rendering, search, and action controls. Additional UI and minor logic adjustments were made across related components. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant TeamTasksTable
participant ReassignUser
participant TeamUserSearchDropdown
participant TasksApi
User->>TeamTasksTable: Click "Reassign" button
TeamTasksTable->>ReassignUser: Open modal
ReassignUser->>TeamUserSearchDropdown: User selects new assignee
TeamUserSearchDropdown-->>ReassignUser: Return selected user
ReassignUser->>TasksApi: Call reassignTask({task_id, executor_id})
TasksApi-->>ReassignUser: Promise resolved
ReassignUser->>TeamTasksTable: Invalidate and refresh tasks list
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
api/tasks/tasks.api.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.30.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-react-hooks". (The package "eslint-plugin-react-hooks" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "eslint-plugin-react-hooks" was referenced from the config file in " » eslint-config-next/core-web-vitals » /node_modules/.pnpm/eslint-config-next@15.3.5_eslint-plugin-import-x@4.16.1_@typescript-eslint+utils@8.36.0_79fa352f41e97200dfc66b7389b5a599/node_modules/eslint-config-next/index.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please see https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/troubleshooting. api/teams/teams.api.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.30.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-react-hooks". (The package "eslint-plugin-react-hooks" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "eslint-plugin-react-hooks" was referenced from the config file in " » eslint-config-next/core-web-vitals » /node_modules/.pnpm/eslint-config-next@15.3.5_eslint-plugin-import-x@4.16.1_@typescript-eslint+utils@8.36.0_79fa352f41e97200dfc66b7389b5a599/node_modules/eslint-config-next/index.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please see https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/troubleshooting. modules/dashboard/components/create-todo-button.tsxOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 9.30.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-react-hooks". (The package "eslint-plugin-react-hooks" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "eslint-plugin-react-hooks" was referenced from the config file in " » eslint-config-next/core-web-vitals » /node_modules/.pnpm/eslint-config-next@15.3.5_eslint-plugin-import-x@4.16.1_@typescript-eslint+utils@8.36.0_79fa352f41e97200dfc66b7389b5a599/node_modules/eslint-config-next/index.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please see https://eslint.org/docs/latest/use/troubleshooting.
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
api/tasks/tasks.api.ts(2 hunks)api/tasks/tasks.types.ts(1 hunks)api/teams/teams.api.ts(1 hunks)components/reassign-user.tsx(1 hunks)components/team-user-search-dropdown.tsx(1 hunks)components/todo-list-table.tsx(4 hunks)modules/dashboard/components/create-todo-button.tsx(1 hunks)modules/teams/components/teams-layout-header.tsx(1 hunks)modules/teams/team-tasks.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (6)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Hariom01010
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-frontend#51
File: __mocks__/types.ts:33-34
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T08:59:13.002Z
Learning: In the todo-frontend project, the PATCH task API endpoint payload uses `dueAt` and `startedAt` field names, but these update the `dueDate` and `startDate` fields respectively in the Task object. This is intentional according to the API contract design.
api/teams/teams.api.ts (1)
Learnt from: yesyash
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-frontend#109
File: app/(internal-routes)/teams/[teamId]/layout.tsx:8-15
Timestamp: 2025-07-16T13:18:36.847Z
Learning: In Next.js layout components, error handling and validation for params extraction (like `const { teamId } = await params`) is not required in this codebase. The framework handles routing validation adequately.
modules/dashboard/components/create-todo-button.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Hariom01010
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-frontend#51
File: __mocks__/types.ts:33-34
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T08:59:13.002Z
Learning: In the todo-frontend project, the PATCH task API endpoint payload uses `dueAt` and `startedAt` field names, but these update the `dueDate` and `startDate` fields respectively in the Task object. This is intentional according to the API contract design.
api/tasks/tasks.api.ts (1)
Learnt from: Hariom01010
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-frontend#51
File: __mocks__/types.ts:33-34
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T08:59:13.002Z
Learning: In the todo-frontend project, the PATCH task API endpoint payload uses `dueAt` and `startedAt` field names, but these update the `dueDate` and `startDate` fields respectively in the Task object. This is intentional according to the API contract design.
components/todo-list-table.tsx (1)
Learnt from: shubhdevelop
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-frontend#35
File: components/SimmerSkeleton.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-03-16T10:34:22.088Z
Learning: The shimmer component in the todo app should maintain the app's color palette (white, indigo-50) without making colors configurable, as it's designed specifically for this application.
modules/teams/team-tasks.tsx (2)
Learnt from: Hariom01010
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-frontend#51
File: __mocks__/types.ts:33-34
Timestamp: 2025-07-09T08:59:13.002Z
Learning: In the todo-frontend project, the PATCH task API endpoint payload uses `dueAt` and `startedAt` field names, but these update the `dueDate` and `startDate` fields respectively in the Task object. This is intentional according to the API contract design.
Learnt from: yesyash
PR: Real-Dev-Squad/todo-frontend#109
File: app/(internal-routes)/teams/[teamId]/layout.tsx:8-15
Timestamp: 2025-07-16T13:18:36.847Z
Learning: In Next.js layout components, error handling and validation for params extraction (like `const { teamId } = await params`) is not required in this codebase. The framework handles routing validation adequately.
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (3)
api/teams/teams.api.ts (1)
api/teams/teams.type.ts (1)
GetTeamByIdReqDto(18-21)
modules/dashboard/components/create-todo-button.tsx (1)
api/tasks/tasks.api.ts (1)
TasksApi(16-68)
api/tasks/tasks.api.ts (2)
api/tasks/tasks.types.ts (1)
ReassignTaskReqDto(109-112)lib/api-client.ts (1)
apiClient(6-10)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
components/team-user-search-dropdown.tsx
[error] 52-53: The elements with the following roles can be changed to the following elements:
For examples and more information, see WAI-ARIA Roles
(lint/a11y/useSemanticElements)
components/reassign-user.tsx
[error] 55-55: This is an unexpected use of the debugger statement.
Unsafe fix: Remove debugger statement
(lint/suspicious/noDebugger)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
api/teams/teams.api.ts (1)
20-20: LGTM! Simplified key generation logic.
Good improvement removing the unnecessary destructuring and renaming. The code is now more readable while maintaining the same functionality.
api/tasks/tasks.types.ts (1)
109-112: LGTM! Well-defined type for task reassignment.
The new ReassignTaskReqDto type is appropriately defined with clear field names. The use of executor_id instead of assignee_id provides good semantic distinction from the initial task assignment flow.
modules/teams/components/teams-layout-header.tsx (1)
97-97: LGTM! Improved button text for clarity.
Good change to make the button text accurately reflect that multiple members can be added, aligning with the modal functionality and title.
api/tasks/tasks.api.ts (2)
9-9: LGTM! Proper import addition for new type.
The ReassignTaskReqDto import is correctly added to support the new reassign task functionality.
62-67: LGTM! Well-implemented reassign task API method.
The new reassignTask method follows established patterns in the codebase:
Uses appropriate PATCH method for updates
Clear and RESTful endpoint structure
Type-safe with proper parameter typing
Consistent return type and error handling approach
components/todo-list-table.tsx (3)
3-3: LGTM! Exports align with modular architecture.
The exports of TodoListTableHeader and TodoListTableRowShimmer components and the import of USER_TYPE_ENUM support the new team tasks implementation while maintaining good separation of concerns.
Also applies to: 24-24, 124-124
68-77: Good approach for consistent table structure.
Always rendering the TableCell and conditionally showing content inside maintains consistent table column structure regardless of the showActions prop value.
114-118: Correctly implements the requirement to hide actions for team-assigned tasks.
The additional check task.assignee?.user_type !== USER_TYPE_ENUM.TEAM properly prevents action buttons from appearing for tasks assigned to teams, aligning with the PR objective.
components/team-user-search-dropdown.tsx (1)
25-96: Well-structured team user selection component.
The component correctly implements a searchable dropdown for team user selection with proper loading states and user feedback. The Command component handles search filtering internally based on the value prop of CommandItem.
modules/teams/team-tasks.tsx (2)
30-72: Excellent implementation of role-based action visibility.
The permission logic correctly:
Shows reassign button only for SPOC when task is assigned to a team
Shows edit button only for the task assignee
Properly passes team data to enable reassignment functionality
This aligns perfectly with the PR objective of allowing SPOCs to reassign tasks.
117-171: Well-structured refactor with proper data fetching and search.
The implementation:
Correctly fetches team and tasks data separately
Implements URL-based search that maintains state across navigation
Properly combines loading states for a smooth user experience
Maintains good separation of concerns between components
components/reassign-user.tsx (2)
29-90: Well-implemented reassignment modal with proper state management.
The modal implementation correctly:
Handles loading and error states with appropriate user feedback
Invalidates the task cache to refresh data after reassignment
Resets state after successful operation
Provides clear UI with disabled states during pending operations
100-117: Remove redundant onClick handler.
The AlertDialogTrigger component already handles opening the dialog when clicked. The onClick handler on line 107 is redundant and can cause issues.
Apply this diff to remove the redundant handler:
<Button
size="icon"
variant="ghost"
- onClick={() => setShowModal(true)}
className="cursor-pointer hover:bg-gray-200 hover:text-gray-800 active:bg-gray-300 active:text-gray-900"
>
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: Hariom01010
PR: #81
File: app/teams/page.tsx:24-30
Timestamp: 2025-07-10T16:13:57.754Z
Learning: With Tailwind v4 + ShadCN, the Button component doesn't apply `cursor-pointer` internally, so explicit `cursor-pointer` classes are necessary and not redundant.
| void queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: TasksApi.getTasks.key() }) | ||
| void queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: TasksApi.getTasks.key() }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove duplicate query invalidation call.
There are two identical calls to queryClient.invalidateQueries with the same query key. This duplication serves no purpose and should be removed.
Apply this diff to remove the duplicate:
void queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: TasksApi.getTasks.key() })
- void queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: TasksApi.getTasks.key() })
toast.success('Todo created successfully')📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| void queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: TasksApi.getTasks.key() }) | |
| void queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: TasksApi.getTasks.key() }) | |
| void queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: TasksApi.getTasks.key() }) | |
| toast.success('Todo created successfully') |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In modules/dashboard/components/create-todo-button.tsx around lines 16 to 17,
there are two identical calls to queryClient.invalidateQueries with the same
query key. Remove one of these duplicate calls to avoid redundant query
invalidation.
| const handleReassign = () => { | ||
| if (!selectedUser) return | ||
|
|
||
| debugger |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove debugger statement before merging.
Debugger statements should not be committed to production code.
Apply this diff to remove the debugger statement:
- debugger
reassignTaskMutation.mutate({📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| debugger | |
| reassignTaskMutation.mutate({ |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 55-55: This is an unexpected use of the debugger statement.
Unsafe fix: Remove debugger statement
(lint/suspicious/noDebugger)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In components/reassign-user.tsx at line 55, there is a debugger statement that
should be removed before merging. Delete the debugger statement to ensure no
debugging code remains in the production codebase.
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review by Korbit AI
Korbit automatically attempts to detect when you fix issues in new commits.
| Category | Issue | Status |
|---|---|---|
 |
Violation of Single Responsibility Principle ▹ view | |
|
Over-specific Component Design ▹ view | |
 |
Inconsistent naming convention usage ▹ view | |
 |
Inline Handler Recreation ▹ view | |
 |
Debugger Statement in Production Code ▹ view | |
|
Missing User Type Validation Field ▹ view | |
 |
Loss of Error Context in Mutation Handler ▹ view | |
|
Overly Broad Cache Invalidation ▹ view | |
|
Development Artifact in Production Code ▹ view | |
|
Long inline Tailwind classes ▹ view |
Files scanned
| File Path | Reviewed |
|---|---|
| api/teams/teams.api.ts | ✅ |
| modules/dashboard/components/create-todo-button.tsx | ✅ |
| api/tasks/tasks.types.ts | ✅ |
| api/tasks/tasks.api.ts | ✅ |
| modules/teams/components/teams-layout-header.tsx | ✅ |
| components/team-user-search-dropdown.tsx | ✅ |
| components/reassign-user.tsx | ✅ |
| components/todo-list-table.tsx | ✅ |
| modules/teams/team-tasks.tsx | ✅ |
Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.
Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
| export type ReassignTaskReqDto = { | ||
| task_id: string | ||
| executor_id: string | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing User Type Validation Field 
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The ReassignTaskReqDto is missing the user_type field which is present in other task assignment-related DTOs and is required for proper user role validation.
Why this matters
Without the user_type field, the API cannot validate if the target user has the appropriate role for the task, potentially allowing assignments to users with incorrect permissions.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Add the user_type field to the DTO:
export type ReassignTaskReqDto = {
task_id: string
assignee_id: string
user_type: USER_TYPE_ENUM
}Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| @@ -105,3 +105,8 @@ export type AssignTaskToUserReqDto = { | |||
| task_id: string | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inconsistent naming convention usage 
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The codebase uses both camelCase (taskId) and snake_case (task_id) naming conventions for properties.
Why this matters
Mixed naming conventions across the codebase reduce readability and make it harder to predict property names. TypeScript conventionally uses camelCase.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Standardize on camelCase throughout:
export type ReassignTaskReqDto = {
taskId: string
assigneeId: string
}
export type AssignTaskToUserReqDto = {
taskId: string
assigneeId: string
}Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| onError: () => { | ||
| toast.error('Failed to reassign task, please try again') | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Loss of Error Context in Mutation Handler 
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The error handler for the reassignTask mutation loses the actual error information by only showing a generic message.
Why this matters
Without the actual error details, debugging production issues becomes more difficult as developers won't know the root cause of the failure.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Include the error information in the error handler:
onError: (error) => {
console.error('Task reassignment failed:', error);
toast.error(`Failed to reassign task: ${error.message || 'Please try again'}`);
}Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| <Button | ||
| size="icon" | ||
| variant="ghost" | ||
| onClick={() => setShowModal(true)} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Inline Handler Recreation 
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The click handler is recreated on every render due to the inline arrow function.
Why this matters
Creating new function references on each render causes unnecessary memory allocations and potential re-renders of child components that rely on prop referential equality.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Extract the click handler to a memoized function using useCallback:
const handleClick = useCallback(() => setShowModal(true), []);
// Then use it as:
<Button onClick={handleClick} ... >Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| mutationFn: TasksApi.reassignTask.fn, | ||
| onSuccess: () => { | ||
| toast.success(`Task assigned to ${selectedUser?.name}`) | ||
| void queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: TasksApi.getTasks.key(teamId) }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Overly Broad Cache Invalidation
Tell me more
What is the issue?
Invalidating the entire task query cache when only a single task is modified is inefficient.
Why this matters
This causes unnecessary refetching of all tasks when only one task's assignment has changed, potentially causing performance issues with large task lists.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Use more specific cache updates by either invalidating just the specific task or using cache mutation:
queryClient.setQueryData([TasksApi.getTasks.key(teamId)], (old: any) => {
// Update only the specific task in the cache
return old.map((task: any) =>
task.id === taskId ? { ...task, executor_id: selectedUser.id } : task
);
});Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| const handleReassign = () => { | ||
| if (!selectedUser) return | ||
|
|
||
| debugger | ||
| reassignTaskMutation.mutate({ | ||
| task_id: taskId, | ||
| executor_id: selectedUser.id, | ||
| }) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Development Artifact in Production Code 
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The handleReassign function contains a debugger statement which should not be in production code.
Why this matters
Leaving debugger statements in production code can cause unexpected pauses in execution when developer tools are open and makes the code less professional.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Remove the debugger statement:
const handleReassign = () => {
if (!selectedUser) return
reassignTaskMutation.mutate({
task_id: taskId,
executor_id: selectedUser.id,
})
}Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| const handleReassign = () => { | ||
| if (!selectedUser) return | ||
|
|
||
| debugger |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Debugger Statement in Production Code
Tell me more
What is the issue?
There is a debugger statement left in the production code in the handleReassign function.
Why this matters
This will cause the application to pause execution when the developer tools are open, disrupting the normal flow of the application in production environments.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Remove the debugger statement:
const handleReassign = () => {
if (!selectedUser) return
reassignTaskMutation.mutate({
task_id: taskId,
executor_id: selectedUser.id,
})
}Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| size="icon" | ||
| variant="ghost" | ||
| onClick={() => setShowModal(true)} | ||
| className="cursor-pointer hover:bg-gray-200 hover:text-gray-800 active:bg-gray-300 active:text-gray-900" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Long inline Tailwind classes
Tell me more
What is the issue?
Long inline Tailwind CSS classes reduce code readability.
Why this matters
Multiple inline Tailwind classes make the component markup harder to scan and understand. These styles could be abstracted into a reusable class or component style.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Extract the styles into a dedicated CSS class or component style:
const buttonStyles = "cursor-pointer hover:bg-gray-200 hover:text-gray-800 active:bg-gray-300 active:text-gray-900"
<Button className={buttonStyles} ... />Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| const { data: usersList, isLoading } = useQuery({ | ||
| queryKey: TeamsApi.getTeamById.key({ teamId, member: true }), | ||
| queryFn: () => TeamsApi.getTeamById.fn({ teamId, member: true }), | ||
| select: (res) => res.users, | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Violation of Single Responsibility Principle
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The component is directly fetching team data to get users, violating separation of concerns and making the component tightly coupled to the TeamsApi.
Why this matters
This design makes the component less reusable and harder to test. If the API structure changes or if we need to fetch users through a different endpoint, we would need to modify this component.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Create a custom hook (e.g., useTeamUsers) that encapsulates the data fetching logic:
// hooks/useTeamUsers.ts
export const useTeamUsers = (teamId: string) => {
return useQuery({
queryKey: TeamsApi.getTeamById.key({ teamId, member: true }),
queryFn: () => TeamsApi.getTeamById.fn({ teamId, member: true }),
select: (res) => res.users,
});
};
// In component
const { data: usersList, isLoading } = useTeamUsers(teamId);Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
| type TeamUserSearchDropdownProps = { | ||
| teamId: string | ||
| value?: string | ||
| placeholder?: string | ||
| onUserSelect: (user: TUser) => void | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Over-specific Component Design
Tell me more
What is the issue?
The component is specifically tied to team users through its props, making it less reusable for other user search scenarios.
Why this matters
This design limits the component's reusability. If we need to search users in a different context, we'd need to create a new component or modify this one.
Suggested change ∙ Feature Preview
Create a more generic UserSearchDropdown component that accepts a users list:
type UserSearchDropdownProps = {
users?: TUser[]
isLoading?: boolean
value?: string
placeholder?: string
onUserSelect: (user: TUser) => void
}Provide feedback to improve future suggestions
💬 Looking for more details? Reply to this comment to chat with Korbit.
1 participant
Date: 19 July 2025
Developer Name: yash raj
Issue Ticket Number
Description
Documentation Updated?
Under Feature Flag
Database Changes
Breaking Changes
Development Tested?
Screenshots
Description by Korbit AI
What change is being made?
Add functionality to re-assign tasks to different users within the application.
Why are these changes being made?
These changes allow for greater flexibility and efficiency in task management by enabling task reassignment, which can be necessary when workloads change or a different team member becomes better suited for a task. This implementation enhances collaboration and resource allocation within teams, even though it may require additional considerations for user permissions and auditing of changes.