Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix eval environment for [[ GForce is.atomic test #4622

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2020
Merged

Conversation

MichaelChirico
Copy link
Member

Closes #4612

cc @ColeMiller1 thanks for testing this works

@ColeMiller1
Copy link
Contributor

Add an update for bug fix item 5 mentioning (at)hongyuanjia for helping refine the fix?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 20, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #4622 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #4622   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.61%   99.61%           
=======================================
  Files          73       73           
  Lines       14224    14224           
=======================================
  Hits        14169    14169           
  Misses         55       55           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
R/data.table.R 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1eca294...7fa4fd2. Read the comment docs.

@mattdowle mattdowle added this to the 1.12.9 milestone Jul 20, 2020
@mattdowle mattdowle merged commit e266c0f into master Jul 20, 2020
@mattdowle mattdowle deleted the j-eval-scope branch July 20, 2020 23:11
hongyuanjia pushed a commit to hongyuanjia/data.table that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

eplusr error on upgrade data.table
3 participants