fix: build breaking

[RandintN]

A meaningful title for PR, not like: made changes to xyz.md

Fixes #

Build not working

Changes done:

• Removed gem lock
• Add missing dependency

Screenshots

Preview Link(s):

✅️ By submitting this PR, I have verified the following

• Checked to see if a similar PR has already been opened 🤔️
• Reviewed the contributing guidelines 🔍️
• Sample preview link added (add the link(s) for all the pages changed/updated from the checks tab after checks complete)
• Tried Squashing the commits into one

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A new gem dependency "rackup" was added to the Gemfile. This is a straightforward dependency inclusion with no modifications to existing gems or their groupings. The addition follows the existing wdm entry without altering the overall structure.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Gem dependency addition Gemfile	Added "rackup" gem dependency

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

No significant complexity: single-line addition to dependency file with minimal risk and straightforward verification through standard dependency checks.

Poem

🐰 A gem so small, yet swift and true,
Rackup arrives in Gemfile's queue,
One line added, neat and clean,
No fuss or fret—the simplest scene!
Thump-thump goes the rabbit's joyful feet! 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'fix: build breaking' is vague and does not clearly communicate the specific change. While it references a build issue, it does not explain what the fix is or why adding the 'rackup' gem dependency resolves the build problem.	Revise the title to be more specific and descriptive, such as 'fix: add rackup gem to resolve build dependency' or similar, to clearly indicate what the actual fix addresses.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/build-breaking

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f8cb565 and aba6ad3.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• Gemfile.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• Gemfile (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

Gemfile (1)

21-21: Add version constraints to unconstrained gems for consistency and reproducibility.

The Gemfile has two gems without version constraints: rackup (line 21) and tzinfo-data (line 15). Most other gems specify versions (e.g., ~> 1.8, ~> 2.16). Adding version constraints to both will improve consistency and prevent unexpected version mismatches across environments.

Consider updating both:

  gem "tzinfo-data"

to

  gem "tzinfo-data", "~> 2.0"

and

  gem "rackup"

to

  gem "rackup", "~> 2.2"

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}