Skip to content

Fix icache_flush xfail to apply for ROCm 7.1 and above - #3832

Closed
talumbau wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
users/talumbau/rocmver72_above
Closed

Fix icache_flush xfail to apply for ROCm 7.1 and above#3832
talumbau wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
users/talumbau/rocmver72_above

Conversation

@talumbau

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Motivation

Remove duplicate skip logic (from bad merge) and update xfail condition to use version comparison instead of string prefix matching, so the test is properly marked as expected-to-fail on ROCm 7.1, 7.2, and beyond.

Technical Details

CI system is starting to test with ROCm 7.2 and we still have the icache flush issue.

@math-ci-jobs

math-ci-jobs Bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

perfci run on commit 10fb75a

math-ci run

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented Jan 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (43.62%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #3832   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    43.62%   43.62%           
========================================
  Files           30       30           
  Lines        11442    11442           
  Branches      1440     1440           
========================================
  Hits          4991     4991           
  Misses        5984     5984           
  Partials       467      467           
Flag Coverage Δ
hipBLASLt 43.62% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@talumbau
talumbau force-pushed the users/talumbau/rocmver72_above branch from 5f78a5b to cdc3397 Compare January 14, 2026 17:59
@math-ci-jobs

math-ci-jobs Bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

perfci run on commit 8c04992

math-ci run

Remove duplicate skip logic (from bad merge) and update xfail condition
to use version comparison instead of string prefix matching, so the test
is properly marked as expected-to-fail on ROCm 7.1, 7.2, and beyond.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@talumbau
talumbau force-pushed the users/talumbau/rocmver72_above branch from cdc3397 to 3c10706 Compare January 16, 2026 17:05
@math-ci-webhook

Copy link
Copy Markdown

perfci run on commit a09993c

math-ci run

@talumbau
talumbau requested review from KKyang and bnemanich January 29, 2026 04:21
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been inactive for 25 days and will be marked as stale.

If you would like to keep this PR open, please:

  • Add new commits
  • Add a comment explaining why it should remain open

This PR will be automatically closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Stale PR has no activity for 25+ days label Apr 22, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This pull request has been automatically closed due to inactivity (30 days with no updates).

If you'd like to continue working on this, feel free to reopen the PR or create a new one.

@github-actions github-actions Bot closed this May 1, 2026
JiaLuo-CAN added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2026
…flydsl_mxfp4_gemm1, under run-only mode it needs the mxfp4 cache
JiaLuo-CAN added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2026
…flydsl_mxfp4_gemm1, under run-only mode it needs the mxfp4 cache
JiaLuo-CAN added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 16, 2026
…flydsl_mxfp4_gemm1, under run-only mode it needs the mxfp4 cache
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants