Skip to content

Revert "feat: [hipblaslt][origami] gfx1250 BBS TN origami library" - #11152

Open
yenong-amd wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
revert-11013-users/yenong-amd/gfx1250-origami
Open

Revert "feat: [hipblaslt][origami] gfx1250 BBS TN origami library"#11152
yenong-amd wants to merge 1 commit into
developfrom
revert-11013-users/yenong-amd/gfx1250-origami

Conversation

@yenong-amd

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reverts #11013

PR causes gfx1250 batch mode 1 unit test failures.

@yenong-amd
yenong-amd requested a review from a team as a code owner August 21, 2026 23:58
@therock-pr-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

❌ PR Check — Action Required

Check Status Details
📝 PR Description ❌ Fail Error: PR description must reference a JIRA ID, ISSUE ID, or a GitHub closing keyword.
Expected: include a JIRA ID / ISSUE ID line (separator : or -, or omitted; value may be a JIRA key, a number with/without #, or a link), OR a closing keyword + issue reference. Accepted examples:
JIRA ID : TESTAUTO-6039
JIRA ID - #330
JIRA ID #330
JIRA ID (on separate line)
ROCM-25757
ISSUE ID : TESTUTO-3334
ISSUE ID #3334
ISSUE ID - TESTAUTO-3433
ISSUE ID (on separate line)
AIRUNTIME-2352
ISSUE ID : https://github.com/<org_name>/<repo_name>/issues/1234
Closes #10
Fixes octo-org/octo-repo#100
Resolves: #123
#123
https://github.com/<org_name>/<repo_name>/issues/123
Current: no valid JIRA/ISSUE/closing-keyword reference found
Forbidden Files ✅ Pass
🧪 Unit Test ✅ Pass PR does not contain code files — Unit Test auto-passed
🔎 pre-commit ✅ Pass
🚫 Draft PR 🔜 To Be Enabled
🚩 Feature Flag 🔜 To Be Enabled
📊 Code Coverage 🔜 To Be Enabled

⚠️ 1 policy check(s) failed. Please address the issues above before this PR can be Reviewed.

🚫 Please fix the failed policies

  • ❌ PR Description

The Not ready to Review label was added to this PR. Once all policies pass, the label is removed automatically.

📖 Need help? See the Policy FAQ for details on every check and how to fix failures.

🙋 Wish to Override Policy?

@therock-pr-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚫 Please fix the failed policies before requesting reviews.

The following policy checks failed:

  • ❌ PR Description

The Not ready to Review label has been added to this PR.
Once all policies pass, the label will be removed automatically.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #11152   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    69.65%   69.65%           
========================================
  Files         2789     2789           
  Lines       459600   459600           
  Branches     67767    67767           
========================================
  Hits        320119   320119           
  Misses      116306   116306           
  Partials     23175    23175           
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
TensileLite-CPP 38.14% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 366e7f7
TensileLite-Unit 76.58% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 366e7f7
hipBLAS 90.62% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 366e7f7
hipBLASLt 35.19% <ø> (ø)
hipCUB 82.68% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 366e7f7
hipDNN 86.89% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 366e7f7
hipFFT 43.29% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 366e7f7
hipRAND 76.12% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 366e7f7
hipSOLVER 69.03% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 366e7f7
hipSPARSE 86.99% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 366e7f7
rocBLAS 48.26% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 366e7f7
rocFFT 51.24% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 366e7f7
rocRAND 57.05% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 366e7f7
rocSOLVER 77.25% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 366e7f7
rocSPARSE 74.59% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 366e7f7
rocThrust 91.60% <ø> (ø) Carriedforward from 366e7f7

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant