Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update ROCm naming #60

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024
Merged

update ROCm naming #60

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 10, 2024

Conversation

LisaDelaney
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@LisaDelaney LisaDelaney changed the title Rocm naming update ROCm naming Nov 20, 2023
@LisaDelaney LisaDelaney marked this pull request as ready for review November 20, 2023 22:21
@saadrahim
Copy link
Member

@LisaDelaney Can you rebase this change or merge develop into your branch?

@saadrahim saadrahim merged commit 5e1cb82 into ROCm:develop Jan 10, 2024
4 checks passed
@LisaDelaney LisaDelaney deleted the rocm-naming branch January 10, 2024 18:09
yhuiYH pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
yhuiYH added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
* Standardize documentation for ReadtheDocs (#73)

* update ROCm naming (#60)

* updated index, toc, and Related Info (#67)

* updated index, toc, and Related Info

* Update .wordlist.txt

Added:
NONINFRINGEMENT
sublicense

* Restored LICENSE.md and removed Related Information

* Update license.md

added new line

* Correct broken links (#76)

* Update LICENSE.md

update to 2024

* Update index.rst

change links from .md to .html

* Update index.rst

on the Licensing page

* Card alignment (#81)

* link fixes, cleanup

---------

Co-authored-by: Sam Wu <sam.wu2@amd.com>
Co-authored-by: Lisa <lisa.delaney@amd.com>
Co-authored-by: randyh62 <42045079+randyh62@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants