Skip to content

Experimental output fusion #3759

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

shivadbhavsar
Copy link
Contributor

Created specifically to match with a pattern found in SDXL. Probably not a good one in general (needs more logic to only work in the right scenarios)

@shivadbhavsar shivadbhavsar self-assigned this Jan 12, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #3759      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    92.16%   92.81%   +0.65%     
===========================================
  Files          515      520       +5     
  Lines        21978    23736    +1758     
===========================================
+ Hits         20256    22030    +1774     
+ Misses        1722     1706      -16     

see 29 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@turneram turneram closed this Mar 7, 2025
@turneram turneram deleted the mlir_fusion_experimental branch March 7, 2025 15:48
@turneram turneram restored the mlir_fusion_experimental branch March 7, 2025 16:20
@turneram turneram reopened this Mar 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants