-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: Fix 'must not'/'may not' wording #8277
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ extern "C" { | |
/** | ||
* @brief Number of address registration retries | ||
* | ||
* @note May not be greater than 7. | ||
* @note Must not be greater than 7. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. dito here, I haven't found any reference on a maximum RFC 6775, 3.3:
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. (The same answer as for #8277 (comment) applies here) |
||
*/ | ||
#define SIXLOWPAN_ND_REG_TRANSMIT_NUMOF (3U) | ||
/** | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reference doesn't name any max value, where does
7
come from - or did I miss that?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we focus on the topic of this PR? This is about replacing "may not" with "must not"! In the meantime I will research why that is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is in fact GNRC-specific (so a follow-up should add something like
[…] with @ref net_gnrc
).