-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
net/cord doc: Usability fixes #16812
net/cord doc: Usability fixes #16812
Conversation
As this removes doxygen exclusions from 16779, to avoid holding up the upcoming CI changes of RIOT-OS/riotdocker#104 with an accidental regression, this should wait for the new riotdocker images to run the checks against. [edit: I did run the static-tests locally, but there doxygen shows additional warnings from unrelated modules; maybe due to an even newer Doxygen version?] |
b821b0f
to
8559d66
Compare
It doesn't seem to need the CI update anymore no? |
Indeed; flag removed and miri's suggestions pulled in. As there were no more review items other than the one that is simple to follow, but warnings about merge conflicts, I'm taking the liberty to rebase. |
The title is long enough that it is easily misread as "Client Configuration" and skipped when looking for common configuration. (Plus none of the other submodules of net_cord spell out the full "Core RD Endpoint and Lookup Client" module name again,a dn all say "CoRE RD Something".)
... anchored both under "compile time configuration" and "Networking / CoRE RD" This makes the related configuration items visible on the same page. Co-authored-by: Martine Lenders <mail@martine-lenders.eu>
The braces (which appear to do nothing) were keeping Doxygen from grouping the three "Endpoint ID defition" parameters (apparently intended to be grouped from the braces in the file) from being shown together. Moreover, they kept CONFIG_CORD_EXTRAARGS from showing.
b6ae295
to
a67336f
Compare
a67336f
to
2caa1bd
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK, but could you re-trigger the static tests?
2caa1bd
to
92e877b
Compare
Thx! |
Contribution description
The CoRD documentation had a few shortcomings, some of which doxygen already warned about, some from general usability, some because the text I added in #16113 was a bit too concise.
Testing procedure