Allow earlier versions of rdflib

[cmungall]

sparqlwrapper requires rdflib >= 6.1.1

I am using a library that uses rdflib6 but intentionally pins to exclude rdflib 6.1.1
https://github.com/hsolbrig/funowl/blob/main/Pipfile

The reason for the pinning is that the rdflib 6.1.x series polluted the rdflib namespaces which broke various tests

This was fixed in rdflib
RDFLib/rdflib#1686

However, there has not yet been a new release of rdflib

Does sparqlwrapper truly require >= 6.1.1 or could it be relaxed to 6.0.x and higher?

[prohde]

I guess this can be closed since there are rdflib releases 6.2.x, 6.3.x, and 7.0.x by now, right?

[cmungall]

Yes, go ahead and close

…

On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 5:43 AM Philipp D. Rohde ***@***.***> wrote: I guess this can be closed since there are rdflib releases 6.2.x, 6.3.x, and 7.0.x by now, right? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#219 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAMMOJVXQ4EJCGLWJ5GFTLX3WBXPANCNFSM5U4LKT4Q> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>