Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

qubes.WaitForSession: refactor by waiting for qrexec-fork-server socket #192

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 13, 2019

Conversation

fepitre
Copy link
Member

@fepitre fepitre commented Nov 2, 2019

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 2, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #192 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #192   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.48%   65.48%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines         394      394           
=======================================
  Hits          258      258           
  Misses        136      136

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8c86664...71ef524. Read the comment docs.

fi
# the above line is _expected_ to be terminated by a signal, don't treat this as a failure
exit 0
while ! [ -e /var/run/qubes/qrexec-server.user.sock ]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You should use the actual username instead of hardcoded user - see the old version how to obtain it.

@qubesos-bot
Copy link

OpenQA test summary

Complete test suite and dependencies: https://openqa.qubes-os.org/tests/4650#dependencies

Failed tests

@marmarek marmarek merged commit 71ef524 into QubesOS:master Nov 13, 2019
@fepitre fepitre deleted the wait branch August 5, 2020 15:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants