Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

template-postprocess: fast path for file-reflink, like file #53

Merged

Conversation

rustybird
Copy link
Contributor

I don't know if any template currently hits this code path, even the fedora-26-minimal root.img is large enough to be split into multiple parts. Maybe Arch Linux?

Related to QubesOS/qubes-core-admin#188

I don't know if any template currently hits this code path, even the
fedora-26-minimal root.img is large enough to be split into multiple
parts. Maybe Arch Linux?

Related to QubesOS/qubes-core-admin#188
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 12, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #53 into master will increase coverage by 0.17%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #53      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   74.73%   74.9%   +0.17%     
=========================================
  Files          47      47              
  Lines        5224    5224              
=========================================
+ Hits         3904    3913       +9     
+ Misses       1320    1311       -9
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
qubesadmin/tools/qvm_template_postprocess.py 82.5% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
qubesadmin/tools/qvm_run.py 83.46% <0%> (+3.93%) ⬆️
qubesadmin/spinner.py 77.41% <0%> (+6.45%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 7f28676...e6466c3. Read the comment docs.

@marmarek marmarek merged commit e6466c3 into QubesOS:master Feb 14, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants