Skip to content

Conversation

@Alex-PLACET
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@Alex-PLACET Alex-PLACET self-assigned this Oct 21, 2025
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 21, 2025

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (main@fbdc234). Learn more about missing BASE report.
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #37   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   80.96%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       34           
  Lines           ?     1529           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1238           
  Misses          ?      291           
  Partials        ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 80.96% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Alex-PLACET Alex-PLACET marked this pull request as ready for review October 21, 2025 14:38
@Alex-PLACET Alex-PLACET requested a review from Hind-M November 7, 2025 14:08
Copy link
Member

@Hind-M Hind-M left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we add deserializer to README and examples like serializer?

// Verify
REQUIRE_EQ(batches.size(), 1);
CHECK_EQ(batches[0].nb_columns(), original_batch.nb_columns());
CHECK_EQ(batches[0].nb_rows(), original_batch.nb_rows());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we check batches content as well?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes I think that should be checked too.

Copy link
Member

@JohanMabille JohanMabille left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree that the README could be updated with an exmaple of deserializer.

}
}
```

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should still add this to examples file to ensure that the same code (as long as it's copied correctly) is running without failures (no typos etc).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants