use AssetResolver internally #3750
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changing the static_view is bw-incompat, and I'm not there yet with it being a good idea. I think it is - but hey.
The issue with AssetResolver in general is that it tries to import the package. This is bw-incompat. On previous versions, you could
add_static_view('does_not_exist:', 'static')and it would work. You could thenconfig.override_asset(to_override='does_not_exist:', override_with='something_that_exists:'). This change requires the initialdoes_not_existpackage to be importable no matter what.