Skip to content

feature/FOUR-18537 #7352

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2024
Merged

feature/FOUR-18537 #7352

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2024

Conversation

luNunezProcessmaker
Copy link
Contributor

@luNunezProcessmaker luNunezProcessmaker commented Sep 10, 2024

Issue & Reproduction Steps

FOUR-18124: FE: Enable the default order in the UI
Add the default order in the query

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:deploy
ci:next
ci:package-ai:feature/FOUR-18537
ci:package-decision-engine:feature/FOUR-18537
ci:package-data-sources:feature/FOUR-18537

@pmPaulis pmPaulis changed the base branch from next to feature/FOUR-18118 September 10, 2024 22:34
@pmPaulis pmPaulis merged commit 1f73dd2 into feature/FOUR-18118 Sep 11, 2024
10 of 17 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants