Skip to content

FOUR-16131 Implement Automated API Testing for Task Endpoint - Monitoring #6923

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 12, 2024

Conversation

caleeli
Copy link
Contributor

@caleeli caleeli commented Jun 7, 2024

Implement Automated API Testing for Task Endpoint - Monitoring

How to Test

Run the API tests.

Related Tickets & Packages

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

ci:next
ci:deploy
ci:pm4-api-testing:FOUR-16131
ci:api-test

.

@tokensPM
Copy link

tokensPM commented Jun 7, 2024

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-fffb37e277.engk8s.processmaker.net

Copy link
Contributor Author

@caleeli caleeli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Update script

@caleeli caleeli requested a review from julceslauhub June 8, 2024 13:40
@ProcessMaker ProcessMaker deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jun 8, 2024
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
No Coverage information No data about Coverage
No Duplication information No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 8, 2024

Preparing to run tests...

Test Case Requests Tasks Duration (p90)
interstitials/v1.0-tasks-pagination.test.js 85456 1570 1.59s
interstitials/v1.1-tasks-pagination.test.js 85456 1570 174.54ms
interstitials/v1.1-tasks-screen.test.js 85456 1570 373.85ms
interstitials/v1.0-tasks-pagination.test.js 86456 2570 927.26ms
interstitials/v1.1-tasks-pagination.test.js 86456 2570 210.48ms
interstitials/v1.1-tasks-screen.test.js 86456 2570 351.02ms
interstitials/v1.0-tasks-pagination.test.js 87456 3570 743.22ms
interstitials/v1.1-tasks-pagination.test.js 87456 3570 169.99ms
interstitials/v1.1-tasks-screen.test.js 87456 3570 339.12ms
interstitials/v1.0-tasks-pagination.test.js 88456 4570 1.11s
interstitials/v1.1-tasks-pagination.test.js 88456 4570 218.12ms
interstitials/v1.1-tasks-screen.test.js 88456 4570 329.67ms
interstitials/v1.0-tasks-pagination.test.js 89456 5570 4.19s
interstitials/v1.1-tasks-pagination.test.js 89456 5570 307.62ms
interstitials/v1.1-tasks-screen.test.js 89456 5570 325.22ms

interstitials/v1.0-tasks-pagination.test.js
interstitials/v1.1-tasks-pagination.test.js
interstitials/v1.1-tasks-screen.test.js

Copy link
Contributor

@julceslauhub julceslauhub left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved

@caleeli caleeli merged commit 1689adf into feature/FOUR-15739 Jun 12, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants