Skip to content

Add process_launchpad_id Property to Helper Process Request Data #6178

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

sanjacornelius
Copy link
Contributor

@sanjacornelius sanjacornelius commented Feb 7, 2024

This PR adds a new property process_launchpad_id in the Helper Process request data object. This property will enable the PLG team to reference the process/launchpad id in which the re-run wizard helper process was initiated.

Solution

  • Add process_launchpad_id property to request data for Guided Template Helper Processes

How to Test

  1. Run a Guided Template helper process.
  2. Upon completion, select the 'Re-run wizard' link in the launchpad.
  3. Close the modal to cancel the request, go to 'Requests -> All Requests'.
  4. Locate the recently canceled request.
  5. View the summary tab.
  6. Ensure the property process_launchpad_id is present.
  7. In the URL, update the URL to navigate to /processes-catalogue/[PROCESS_LAUNCHPAD_ID].
  8. Ensure the id corresponds to the correct launchpad.

Related Tickets & Packages

FOUR-14079

ci:next
ci:deploy

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

Copy link

@tokensPM
Copy link

tokensPM commented Feb 7, 2024

QA server K8S was successfully deployed https://ci-f58227230f.engk8s.processmaker.net

Copy link
Contributor

@mcraeteisha mcraeteisha left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved!

@ryancooley ryancooley merged commit 5dac532 into next Feb 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants