-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
Verbose dt pfn #153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Verbose dt pfn #153
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @noahho, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request significantly enhances the observability of the DecisionTreeTabPFN
and TabPFNRegressor
models by introducing comprehensive verbose logging. The changes are designed to provide developers and users with more detailed runtime information about the model's operations, including data processing, tree construction, and prediction logic, without altering the core functionality. This will greatly assist in debugging and understanding the model's behavior.
Highlights
- Enhanced Verbosity and Logging: Integrated the
logging
module and added numerous conditional logging statements throughout theDecisionTreeTabPFN
andTabPFNRegressor
classes. These logs provide detailed insights into the model's internal processes, such as data shapes, adaptive tree decisions, tree fitting progress, leaf fitting, and pruning outcomes. - Improved Debuggability: The new logging statements, activated when
self.verbose
is true, offer a clearer view of the execution flow within the decision tree, aiding in debugging and understanding the model's behavior at various stages of fitting and prediction. - Configurable Logging: A basic logging configuration has been added to set the default logging level to INFO, ensuring that verbose messages are captured when enabled.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds comprehensive logging functionality to the DecisionTreeTabPFN implementation to provide verbose output during training and prediction processes.
- Adds logging configuration and verbose logging statements throughout the decision tree fitting and prediction pipeline
- Enables detailed progress tracking for adaptive tree operations, leaf fitting, and node-level predictions
- Replaces empty verbose placeholder methods with actual logging statements
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
src/tabpfn_extensions/rf_pfn/sklearn_based_decision_tree_tabpfn.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/tabpfn_extensions/rf_pfn/sklearn_based_decision_tree_tabpfn.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces verbose logging to the DecisionTreeTabPFN
classes, which is a valuable addition for debugging and understanding the model's behavior. The logging is controlled by the verbose
flag, which is good. However, the implementation uses logging.basicConfig()
to configure the root logger. This is not a recommended practice for libraries, as it can interfere with the logging setup of applications that use this library. My review focuses on refactoring the logging to follow best practices for libraries, which involves using a named, module-level logger and leaving the configuration to the application.
# Configure logging | ||
logging.basicConfig( | ||
level=logging.INFO, format="%(asctime)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s" | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Configuring the root logger with logging.basicConfig()
in a library is not recommended as it can interfere with the logging configuration of the application using the library. A library should not configure handlers on the root logger. Instead, it should use a module-level logger and let the application configure the logging.1
Please remove this basicConfig
call. You should define a module-level logger at the top of the file (e.g., after imports) like logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
and then use logger.info()
and logger.warning()
for logging.
Style Guide References
Footnotes
-
Python's official logging HOWTO for libraries advises against calling
basicConfig
and instead usinglogging.getLogger(__name__)
to allow the application developer to control logging configuration. ↩
No description provided.