Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Universal Deploy #1819

Merged
merged 100 commits into from
Dec 10, 2019
Merged

Universal Deploy #1819

merged 100 commits into from
Dec 10, 2019

Conversation

cicdw
Copy link
Member

@cicdw cicdw commented Dec 10, 2019

The official universal deploy PR to master. Opening to investigate any remaining test failures.

Windows support TBD.

Add auto-labeling of flow environments based on storage type
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 10, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1819 into master will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 92.48%.

@cicdw cicdw changed the title [WIP] Universal Deploy Universal Deploy Dec 10, 2019
@@ -29,11 +31,10 @@ def __init__(self) -> None:

logger = logging.getLogger("resource-manager")
logger.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)
ch = logging.StreamHandler()
ch = logging.StreamHandler(sys.stdout)
ch.setLevel(logging.DEBUG)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we can solve this later after this PR, but it seems that this is hard coded to a debugging log level instead of deriving the level from the config

wagoodman
wagoodman previously approved these changes Dec 10, 2019
Copy link

@wagoodman wagoodman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! Excited to hit merge on this one...

@cicdw cicdw merged commit f66c338 into master Dec 10, 2019
@cicdw cicdw deleted the deploy-2.2 branch December 10, 2019 16:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants