Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dask task affinity! #1229

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 13, 2019
Merged

Dask task affinity! #1229

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 13, 2019

Conversation

cicdw
Copy link
Member

@cicdw cicdw commented Jul 13, 2019

Thanks for contributing to Prefect!

Please describe your work and make sure your PR:

  • adds new tests (if appropriate)
  • updates CHANGELOG.md (if appropriate)
  • updates docstrings for any new functions or function arguments, including docs/outline.toml for API reference docs (if appropriate)

Note that your PR will not be reviewed unless all three boxes are checked.

What does this PR change?

This PR implements the ability to tag tasks with dask-resource:KEY=VALUE for hooking into Dask Worker Resources.

Why is this PR important?

This PR lets users create tasks with "task affinity" -> i.e., tasks with appropriate tags will only be submitted to workers which claim to support those tags. This allows certain tasks to run next to GPUs, other hardware, etc. in a very simple and lightweight fashion.

@cicdw cicdw requested review from jlowin and joshmeek as code owners July 13, 2019 01:26
@cicdw cicdw changed the title Dask task affinity! 🎉 Dask task affinity! Jul 13, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 13, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #1229 into master will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 95.65%.

Copy link
Member

@jlowin jlowin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@cicdw cicdw merged commit 135e399 into master Jul 13, 2019
@cicdw cicdw deleted the dask-affinity branch July 13, 2019 01:39
abrookins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants