Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 24, 2020. It is now read-only.

Use ip command for VPN segment - fix #1125 #1126

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Feb 25, 2019
Merged

Conversation

mcinquin
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you so much for opening a PR for P9k! Many of our best features and segments have come from the community, and we are excited to see your contribution.

To help you make the best PR, here are some guidelines:

  • The master branch is our stable branch, and the next branch is our development branch. If you are submitting a bug fix, please file your PR against master. If it is a new feature, enhancement, segment, or something similar, please submit it against next. For more information, please see our Developer's Guide.
  • We maintain unit tests for segments and features in the test directory. Please add unit tests for anything new you have developed! If you aren't sure how to do this, go ahead and file your PR and ask for help!
  • For running manual tests in different environments, we have Vagrant and Docker configurations. Please see the Test README and make sure your new feature is working as expected!
  • If your PR requires user configuration, please make sure that it includes an update to the README describing this.
  • P9k maintains a lot of useful information in our Wiki. Depending on the content of your PR, we might ask you to update the Wiki (or provide text for us to use) to document your work. Most PRs don't require this.
  • Please make your commit messages useful! Here is a great short guide on useful commit messages.

Once you have submitted your PR, P9k core contributors will review the code and work with you to get it merged. During this process, we might request changes to your code and discuss different ways of doing things. This is all part of the open source process, and our goal is to help you create the best contribution possible for P9k =).

Please follow this template for creating your PR:

Title

Please make the title of your PR descriptive! If appropriate, please prefix the title with one of these tags:

  • [Bugfix]
  • [New Segment]
  • [Docs]
  • [Enhancement]

Description

Please describe the contribution your PR makes! Screenshots are especially helpful, here, if it's a new segment.

If your PR is addressing an issue, please reference the Issue number here.

Questions

Is there something in your PR you're not sure about or need help with? Is there a particular piece of code you would like feedback on? Let us know here!

This is done if we want to show a public IP, internal IP, or a VPN.
In the VPN case, what we actually want is to display an indicator
that a VPN is active, instead of the VPN IP itself. We parse the
IP here anyway, because we want to save some specific code there.
@dritter
Copy link
Member

dritter commented Feb 3, 2019

Hi @Shini31 ,

I made some changes to your code ninja-style. The code now runs without externals and is now the same for checking for VPN, as well as parsing public and internal IPs. Could you double check if everything still works for you and report here back? That would be awesome.

Thanks

Copy link
Member

@Syphdias Syphdias left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. I just had a few minor nitpicks.

test/segments/ip.spec Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/segments/ip.spec Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/segments/public_ip.spec Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/segments/public_ip.spec Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/segments/vpn_ip.spec Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/segments/vpn_ip.spec Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@dritter
Copy link
Member

dritter commented Feb 21, 2019

@Syphdias Thanks for the review. As I am not the originator of this PR, it seems like I cannot apply your suggestions. Do you mind if I just copy them over, or do you want to create a separate branch where I can cherry-pick them?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@mcinquin mcinquin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dritter dritter merged commit 613b798 into Powerlevel9k:master Feb 25, 2019
@dritter
Copy link
Member

dritter commented Feb 25, 2019

Thx @Shini31

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants