Add Archive resource

[kwirkykat]

Adding the cleaned Archive resource.

---

This change is 

[msftclas]

Hi @kwirkykat, I'm your friendly neighborhood Microsoft Pull Request Bot (You can call me MSBOT). Thanks for your contribution!

It looks like you're a Microsoft contributor. If you're full-time or an intern, we DON'T require a Contribution License Agreement. If you are a vendor, please DO sign the electronic Contribution License Agreement. It will take 2 minutes and there's no faxing! https://cla.microsoft.com.

TTYL, MSBOT;

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #41 into dev will increase coverage by 1%.
The diff coverage is 89%.

@@         Coverage Diff          @@
##            dev    #41    +/-   ##
====================================
+ Coverage    80%    81%    +1%     
====================================
  Files        15     16     +1     
  Lines      2149   2448   +299     
  Branches      4      4            
====================================
+ Hits       1736   2005   +269     
- Misses      409    439    +30     
  Partials      4      4

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cd6a318...1f0238b. Read the comment docs.

[mbreakey3]

---

Reviewed 19 of 19 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.

---

Tests/Integration/MSFT_Archive.EndToEnd.Tests.ps1, line 3 at r1 (raw file):

$errorActionPreference = 'Stop'
Set-StrictMode -Version 'Latest'

Should we still add in the 'if not on 5.1' check?

---

Comments from Reviewable

[mbreakey3]

Just had the comment about the integration tests still requiring the 5.1 check or not

---

Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.

---

Comments from Reviewable

[kwirkykat]

Review status: 17 of 19 files reviewed at latest revision, 1 unresolved discussion.

---

Tests/Integration/MSFT_Archive.EndToEnd.Tests.ps1, line 3 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, mbreakey3 (Mariah) wrote…

Should we still add in the 'if not on 5.1' check?

Added it

---

Comments from Reviewable

[mbreakey3]

Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r2.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.

---

Comments from Reviewable