Skip to content

Conversation

shyambhongle
Copy link
Member

Changes in this pull request:
Code refactor: simplified code for better readability when showing sample trees markers on map.

@mohitb35

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 11, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
planet-webapp-multi-tenancy-setup ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 11, 2025 5:52am
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
planet-webapp ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 11, 2025 5:52am
planet-webapp-temp ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 11, 2025 5:52am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 11, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces a new interface SampleTreeMarkerProps and a functional component SampleTreeMarker to manage the rendering of individual sample markers in the PlantLocations component. It also adds constants for validating selectedInterventionType and determining when markers should be rendered, replacing inline conditional logic. These changes enhance the modularity and readability of the code by separating concerns related to validation and rendering.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/features/projectsV2/ProjectsMap/.../PlantLocations.tsx Added SampleTreeMarkerProps interface and SampleTreeMarker component. Introduced validation constants for selectedInterventionType and rendering logic.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant PL as PlantLocations
    participant VC as Validation Check
    participant ST as SampleTreeMarker

    PL->>VC: Validate selectedInterventionType
    alt Valid Intervention
        PL->>ST: Call SampleTreeMarker with sample data
    else
        PL-->>PL: Skip rendering markers
    end
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

PR: reviewed-approved

Suggested reviewers

  • norbertschuler

Poem

I hopped through code with glee,
A new marker here, a check to see,
SampleTreeMarker hopped into play,
Simplifying code along the way,
From bugs to blooms, so bright and free! 🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

npm warn config production Use --omit=dev instead.
npm error code ERESOLVE
npm error ERESOLVE could not resolve
npm error
npm error While resolving: eslint-config-airbnb@18.2.1
npm error Found: eslint@8.57.1
npm error node_modules/eslint
npm error dev eslint@"^8.26.0" from the root project
npm error peer eslint@"6 || 7 || 8" from @emotion/eslint-plugin@11.12.0
npm error node_modules/@emotion/eslint-plugin
npm error dev @emotion/eslint-plugin@"^11.12.0" from the root project
npm error 15 more (@eslint-community/eslint-utils, ...)
npm error
npm error Could not resolve dependency:
npm error peer eslint@"^5.16.0 || ^6.8.0 || ^7.2.0" from eslint-config-airbnb@18.2.1
npm error node_modules/eslint-config-airbnb
npm error dev eslint-config-airbnb@"^18.2.0" from the root project
npm error
npm error Conflicting peer dependency: eslint@7.32.0
npm error node_modules/eslint
npm error peer eslint@"^5.16.0 || ^6.8.0 || ^7.2.0" from eslint-config-airbnb@18.2.1
npm error node_modules/eslint-config-airbnb
npm error dev eslint-config-airbnb@"^18.2.0" from the root project
npm error
npm error Fix the upstream dependency conflict, or retry
npm error this command with --force or --legacy-peer-deps
npm error to accept an incorrect (and potentially broken) dependency resolution.
npm error
npm error
npm error For a full report see:
npm error /.npm/_logs/2025-02-11T05_46_49_782Z-eresolve-report.txt
npm error A complete log of this run can be found in: /.npm/_logs/2025-02-11T05_46_49_782Z-debug-0.log


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/features/projectsV2/ProjectsMap/microComponents/PlantLocations.tsx (2)

163-168: Consider moving intervention types to a constants file.

Moving the intervention type values to a shared constants file would improve maintainability and reusability. This also helps ensure consistency across the codebase when these values are needed elsewhere.

+// In src/utils/constants/intervention.ts
+export const VALID_INTERVENTION_TYPES = [
+  'multi-tree-registration',
+  'enrichment-planting',
+  'all',
+  'default'
+] as const;

-  const isValidInterventionType = [
-    'multi-tree-registration',
-    'enrichment-planting',
-    'all',
-    'default'
-  ].includes(selectedInterventionType);
+  const isValidInterventionType = VALID_INTERVENTION_TYPES.includes(selectedInterventionType);

177-193: Consider these improvements to the SampleTreeMarker component.

  1. Move the props type definition to a separate interface for better reusability and readability.
  2. Simplify the className template literal using a conditional.
+interface SampleTreeMarkerProps {
+  sample: SamplePlantLocation;
+  selectedSamplePlantLocation: SamplePlantLocation | null;
+  openPl: (e: React.MouseEvent<HTMLDivElement>, pl: SamplePlantLocation) => void;
+}

-const SampleTreeMarker = ({ sample, selectedSamplePlantLocation, openPl }: { sample: SamplePlantLocation, selectedSamplePlantLocation: SamplePlantLocation | null, openPl: (e: React.MouseEvent<HTMLDivElement>, pl: SamplePlantLocation) => void }) => (
+const SampleTreeMarker = ({ sample, selectedSamplePlantLocation, openPl }: SampleTreeMarkerProps) => (
   <Marker
     key={`${sample.id}-sample`}
     latitude={sample.geometry.coordinates[1]}
     longitude={sample.geometry.coordinates[0]}
     anchor="center"
   >
     <div
       key={`${sample.id}-marker`}
-      className={`${styles.single} ${sample.hid === selectedSamplePlantLocation?.hid ? styles.singleSelected : ''}`}
+      className={`${styles.single} ${sample.hid === selectedSamplePlantLocation?.hid && styles.singleSelected}`}
       role="button"
       tabIndex={0}
       onClick={(e) => openPl(e, sample)}
     />
   </Marker>
 );
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b812ab1 and a726a4f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/features/projectsV2/ProjectsMap/microComponents/PlantLocations.tsx (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/features/projectsV2/ProjectsMap/microComponents/PlantLocations.tsx (2)

170-175: Great job on improving code readability!

The introduction of shouldRenderMarkers effectively consolidates multiple conditions into a clear, descriptive boolean expression. This makes the code more maintainable and easier to understand.


254-263: Excellent refactoring of the marker rendering logic!

The code is now more maintainable with:

  • Clear conditional rendering using shouldRenderMarkers
  • Proper component composition with SampleTreeMarker
  • Correct usage of the key prop in the map function

Copy link
Collaborator

@mohitb35 mohitb35 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - made a minor refactor to move SampleTreeMarker outside the PlantLocations component

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/features/projectsV2/ProjectsMap/microComponents/PlantLocations.tsx (2)

28-51: Consider memoizing the SampleTreeMarker component.

While the implementation is clean and follows React best practices, consider wrapping the component with React.memo to prevent unnecessary re-renders when parent components update.

-const SampleTreeMarker = ({
+const SampleTreeMarker = React.memo(({
   sample,
   selectedSamplePlantLocation,
   openPl,
-}: SampleTreeMarkerProps) => (
+}: SampleTreeMarkerProps) => (
   <Marker
     key={`${sample.id}-sample`}
     latitude={sample.geometry.coordinates[1]}
     longitude={sample.geometry.coordinates[0]}
     anchor="center"
   >
     <div
       key={`${sample.id}-marker`}
       className={`${styles.single} ${
         sample.hid === selectedSamplePlantLocation?.hid
           ? styles.singleSelected
           : ''
       }`}
       role="button"
       tabIndex={0}
       onClick={(e) => openPl(e, sample)}
     />
   </Marker>
-));
+)));

196-201: Move intervention type validation array outside component.

Consider moving the validation array outside the component to prevent recreation on each render and improve code organization.

+const VALID_INTERVENTION_TYPES = [
+  'multi-tree-registration',
+  'enrichment-planting',
+  'all',
+  'default',
+] as const;
+
 export default function PlantLocations(): React.ReactElement {
   // ...
-  const isValidInterventionType = [
-    'multi-tree-registration',
-    'enrichment-planting',
-    'all',
-    'default',
-  ].includes(selectedInterventionType);
+  const isValidInterventionType = VALID_INTERVENTION_TYPES.includes(selectedInterventionType);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a726a4f and 7d90b50.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/features/projectsV2/ProjectsMap/microComponents/PlantLocations.tsx (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/features/projectsV2/ProjectsMap/microComponents/PlantLocations.tsx (2)

19-26: LGTM! Well-structured interface definition.

The SampleTreeMarkerProps interface is well-typed and follows TypeScript best practices, making the component's contract clear and type-safe.


203-208: LGTM! Improved marker rendering logic.

The code has been successfully refactored to be more readable and maintainable by:

  • Extracting complex conditions into well-named constants
  • Using a dedicated component for marker rendering
  • Implementing clear conditional rendering logic

Also applies to: 269-278

@mohitb35 mohitb35 merged commit b61d2fd into develop Feb 11, 2025
9 checks passed
@mohitb35 mohitb35 deleted the feature/code-refactor-intervention branch February 11, 2025 06:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants