Skip to content

Conversation

@mooreds
Copy link
Contributor

@mooreds mooreds commented Jan 6, 2026

change to reference a period, not a comma, for linking across entities

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated relation access syntax in the ReBAC use case documentation to use period (.) for parent relation access instead of comma (,).

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@mooreds mooreds requested a review from ucatbas January 6, 2026 18:55
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 6, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A documentation file is updated to replace the relation access delimiter for parent organization relations from a comma to a period, and a trailing newline is added to the file.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Updates
docs/use-cases/rebac.mdx
Updated parent relation access syntax from comma to period delimiter; added trailing newline for proper file termination

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A comma once sat where a dot now plays,
In the docs we hop through relation highways,
With a period's grace, the syntax now reads,
Organization parents and relation deeds! 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'docs: fix entity linking character' directly and specifically describes the main change: fixing the character used for entity linking from comma to period in documentation.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5774513 and 1eb615e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/use-cases/rebac.mdx
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Test with Coverage
  • GitHub Check: Scan Container for Vulnerabilities
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
  • GitHub Check: Test with Coverage
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/use-cases/rebac.mdx (1)

128-128: Documentation fix correctly aligns with the schema syntax.

The change accurately updates the documentation to reference a period (.) as the relation access delimiter, which matches the actual schema syntax used in the examples (e.g., parent.admin and parent.member on lines 122-123).


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 6, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.55%. Comparing base (5774513) to head (1eb615e).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #2728   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.55%   82.55%           
=======================================
  Files          74       74           
  Lines        8125     8125           
=======================================
  Hits         6707     6707           
  Misses        903      903           
  Partials      515      515           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mooreds mooreds merged commit 1d55a8d into master Jan 6, 2026
14 of 15 checks passed
@mooreds mooreds deleted the mooreds/per-128 branch January 6, 2026 19:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants